To: Cobra64
I keep hearing that, but I dont think it would scare them as much as most of you fools seem to think it would.
Punish the terrorists, not the pigs.
I think your idea would fail miserably and probably backfire somewhat.
This is 2003 not 1803.
41 posted on
08/12/2003 2:12:12 PM PDT by
Sabretooth
(I have already previewed or do not wish to preview this composition.)
To: Sabretooth
A similar situation was carried out by General (Blackjack) Pershing in the Philipines around 1914.
BTW, I'm not sure why you refer to me as a "fool." Do you insult people who don't believe everything you have an opinion on? You seem to be overly series.
60 posted on
08/12/2003 2:24:58 PM PDT by
Cobra64
(Babes should wear Bullet Bras - www.BulletBras.net)
To: Sabretooth
I understand your doubts.
It is hard to believe that anyone'd be so superstitious these days as to believe that contact with pigs would damn them to Hell.
However... We ARE after all talking about the same supertitious idiots who believe that blowing themselves up in the midst of "enemy" civilians will automatically land them permanently neck-deep in p(censored) in the Pearly Gates Bordello.
*shrugging*
Blackjack Pershing found pork to be an effective moral weapon.
87 posted on
08/12/2003 4:13:53 PM PDT by
King Prout
(people hear and do not listen, see and do not observe, speak without thought, post and not edit)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson