To: George W. Bush
Tabloid site???
Strange accusation in a world run by the New York Times standard of journalism.
Dispute, one, 1, uno, un, I, any of the facts cited in the article.
Dare ya!
To: johnqueuepublic
Dispute, one, 1, uno, un, I, any of the facts cited in the article.
Dispute them? The key facts are mere conjecture and supposition, not reporting. These its-likely-that-Dean and Dean-loves-abortion-so-much-that kinds of 'facts' aren't facts at all. Nothing more than speculation. Personally, I doubt Dean is a competent enough surgeon (even by the low standards of Planned Parenthood) to risk any kind of surgery, even an abortion.
I've seen a half-dozen of these articles from Pipeline this year here on FR.
I always notice a few facts that no one else seems to report. That's why I'm suspicious. Given that the subject matter is written about extensively, it's something of a puzzle why only Pipeline includes a few extra 'facts'. This includes comparing their articles with WND and NewsMax, not just the libmedia sources.
Your mileage may vary. But Pipeline isn't yet well-established as having any journalistic credibility. Even by Internet standards. And saying that they're better than Debka or Slate or Salon wouldn't be saying much.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson