I know it is.
Can't blame this one on Bush. The obstructionists are the Senate Democrats who refuse to name members to the conference committee.
As a conservative Christian, let me weigh in -- My top priority is the appointment of strict constructionist judges who have respect for the law and the U.S. Constitution, who will interpret law, not make it. I've been pleased with Bush's judicial appointments, but we all know the tactics of the left in opposing those nominations. I believe that the biggest reason Bush needed to be elected was to reshape the composition of the courts. Bush's work toward this is far from over. This reason alone is justification to have him reelected.
Does the author propose that if this case is decided against the Alabama judge at the SCOTUS level, the Federal government should not enforce the decision?