To: LTCJ
No. If Rose had been caught sodomizing his bookie in the dugout, he would be in the Hall of Fame. Instead, he was caught telephoning his bookie from the dugout and must be chastized for life.
To: Mr. Lucky
Are you trying to turn this into an anti-gay rant?
150 posted on
08/12/2003 1:41:21 PM PDT by
Conservative til I die
(They say anti-Catholicism is the thinking man's anti-Semitism; that's an insult to thinking men)
To: Mr. Lucky
Pete Rose bet on baseball. Pete Rose bet on his games. Pete Rose broke the rules over and over. Pete should never be allowed back into the game.
Allowing him back in is a good reason for me to not watch baseball.
To: Mr. Lucky
If Rose had been caught sodomizing his bookie in the dugout, he would be in the Hall of Fame. Instead, he was caught telephoning his bookie from the dugout and must be chastized for life. Sodomizing his bookie does not create a conflict of interest. Betting on baseball (even betting on his own team to win, as has been repeatedly explained on this thread) does.
196 posted on
08/14/2003 7:51:36 AM PDT by
steve-b
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson