Skip to comments.
Big 3 Networks to Mark 9/11 with Harder Stance (They figure they can ambush the Administration now)
Yahoo! News / Hollywood Reporter ^
| 8.12.03
| Andrew Grossman
Posted on 08/12/2003 6:57:13 AM PDT by mhking
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-24 next last
They figure they can slip back into their "we hate the President" mode and do their level best to make the Administration look bad.
1
posted on
08/12/2003 6:57:13 AM PDT
by
mhking
To: Howlin; Ed_NYC; MonroeDNA; widgysoft; Springman; Timesink; dubyaismypresident; Grani; coug97; ...
Just damn.If you want on the new list, FReepmail me. This IS a high-volume PING list...
2
posted on
08/12/2003 6:57:29 AM PDT
by
mhking
To: mhking
I foresee another rating bonanza for FOX.
3
posted on
08/12/2003 6:58:26 AM PDT
by
mewzilla
To: mhking
I hope we find some WMD's, Saddam, and OBL's remains before 9-11. I suspect this post is correct, the media is preparing to launch a huge attack on Bush.
4
posted on
08/12/2003 7:00:00 AM PDT
by
1Old Pro
To: 1Old Pro
Soooo....what's new? 60% of the people are behind the President.....this is going to backfire.
5
posted on
08/12/2003 7:10:13 AM PDT
by
goodnesswins
(Join the Democrat party......be a COMMIE in drag.)
To: mhking
The celebrations begin at DU:
6
posted on
08/12/2003 7:11:35 AM PDT
by
dead
(Perdicaris alive or Raisuli dead!)
To: mhking
All the networks agreed they will downplay the sentimental coverage of a year ago. "The second anniversary feels different than the first one," NBC's Lukasiewicz saidMaybe to them, probably to them, but CERTAINLY NOT to me!! Alas, they are starting only 2 years after the event to minimize the tragedy and attempt to re-focus the responsibility away from Islamic terrorists.
Before too many years, 9-11 from the perspective of the media will have lost all it's poignancy, lost much of it's meaning and lost everything we should learn and re-learn from it. The media hardly if ever, recognizes Pearl Harbor Day at ths point. So odious that they strive to do the same with the attack on America in this century. Ptuuiii!! spit.
I hope that David Kay's report comes out just after this, and illustrates the corruption and commie agenda of so much of American media so brightly that even the blind can see them for the traitors they are. This is beyond disgraceful!
Prairie
7
posted on
08/12/2003 7:24:42 AM PDT
by
prairiebreeze
(Middle East terrorists to the world: " We don't want no STINKING PEACE!!")
To: mhking
bump
To: mhking
I don't care what they say, as long as they SHOW THOSE PICTURES three or four times. Everything else will take care of itself.
9
posted on
08/12/2003 7:41:56 AM PDT
by
LS
To: 1Old Pro
These are same people who would not show the jumpers flying out the top of the WTC on 911 on TV. Sick.
To fight off the leftist morons who anguish over driving SUV's with bumper stickers with such BS as "WAR IS NOT THE ANSWER," I plan to attend events that will take 9-11 seriously. I know of events planned at special Boy Scout meetings to commemorate 9-11. Perhaps there are others that veterans are planning.
Don't take this sitting down.
10
posted on
08/12/2003 7:43:44 AM PDT
by
flamefront
(To the victor go the oils. No oil or oil-money for islamofascist weapons of mass annihilation.)
To: flamefront
11
posted on
08/12/2003 7:56:08 AM PDT
by
flamefront
(To the victor go the oils. No oil or oil-money for islamofascist weapons of mass annihilation.)
To: mhking
12
posted on
08/12/2003 7:59:28 AM PDT
by
ChadGore
(Kakkate Koi!)
To: prairiebreeze; mhking
Hmmmmm. David Kay. Said to have a report first coming out "in six months...." or then "..end of year..." now "SEPTEMBER."
Strategery? I hope so.
13
posted on
08/12/2003 8:02:49 AM PDT
by
sam_paine
(X .................................)
To: mhking
Can't understand why their news ratings are tanking. Most of us wouldn't believe the salaries they pull down to be this incompetent. They put these shows on for each other because most viewers who pay attention to current events are not lefties.
14
posted on
08/12/2003 8:07:25 AM PDT
by
Let's Roll
(And those that cried Appease! Appease! are hanged by those they tried to please!")
To: mhking
I guess this means they will look into the intelligence and foreign policy failures of the previous presidency, and follow the Saudi money trail to Clinton administration officials, right? Right?
15
posted on
08/12/2003 9:02:11 AM PDT
by
fnord
( Hyprocisy is the tribute vice pays to virtue)
To: mhking
Translation: Fun's fun, folks, but it's time to get to the important task at hand: Elect a Democrat in '04.
16
posted on
08/12/2003 9:04:48 AM PDT
by
Cyber Liberty
(© 2003, Ravin' Lunatic since 4/98)
To: ChadGore
ROTF!!!! Jeez, there went my lunch!!
17
posted on
08/12/2003 9:07:07 AM PDT
by
mewzilla
To: mhking
Negative and blame the Bush administration is all the media cares about. It's about their politics. They keep showing their bias and can continue to do so because they will continue to prove the point that they are liberals spewing their propaganda. The media needs to be hit with slander suits and the like. They are spinning out of control and becoming ever more flagrant.
To: GOPJ; Pharmboy; reformed_democrat; RatherBiased.com; nopardons; Tamsey; Miss Marple; SwatTeam; ...
This is the nascent Mainstream Media Shenanigans ping list. Please freepmail me to be added or dropped.
Please note this will likely become a high-volume list.
Also feel free to ping me if you come across a thread you would think worthy of the ping list. I can't catch them all!
19
posted on
08/12/2003 10:14:44 AM PDT
by
Timesink
To: LS
Not a chance they'll be showing the pictures. This will be an opportunity for them to bash Ashcroft, Rumsfeld, Rice and of course, Cheney.
Just another nail in the coffin of spiraling downward ratings for the elite media.
20
posted on
08/12/2003 10:20:31 AM PDT
by
OldFriend
((Dems inhabit a parallel universe))
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-24 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson