Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: WestPacSailor
"It would make spectacular news footage, but the likelyhood of a MANPAD actuall bringing a 747 DOWN is pretty slim."

I don't know about you, but I would not want to be on one of those "Pretty Slim" 747's.Good ole Murphy has a habit of showing himself.

8 posted on 08/12/2003 5:51:30 AM PDT by JustAnAmerican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]


To: JustAnAmerican
I don't know about you, but I would not want to be on one of those "Pretty Slim" 747's

Don't get me wrong...I would not want to be on one either! However, I still fly. I believe that when my number is up, it's up. Besides, I am destined to die doing something really stupid, nothing so mundane as an airplane crash.

Hey, Cleetus, hold muh beer...

12 posted on 08/12/2003 5:56:39 AM PDT by WestPacSailor (I used to be clueless but I've turned that situation around 360 degrees.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: JustAnAmerican; WestPacSailor
Sailor,

You're correct that these airliners are designed to fly minus an engine (or two). And even though the engine mounts are designed to shear off the wing under severe torque....I'm not sure I'd want to test such circumstances during climb-out under full throttle with a few pounds of high explosives inserted into the exhaust!

I'm confident Boeing never did flight tests for that!
58 posted on 08/12/2003 7:51:05 AM PDT by sam_paine (X .................................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson