Skip to comments.
AOL GONE
New York Post ^
| 8/12/03
| TIM ARANGO
Posted on 08/12/2003 12:44:29 AM PDT by kattracks
Edited on 05/26/2004 5:15:54 PM PDT by Jim Robinson.
[history]
August 12, 2003 -- AOL Time Warner may drop its embarrassing first name.
The boss of the popular online-service provider has asked that the familiar moniker AOL be dropped from the media behemoth's official corporate name - because the scandals surrounding the company are hurting his "consumer brand."
(Excerpt) Read more at nypost.com ...
TOPICS: Business/Economy; Extended News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: aol; stevecase; timewarner
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-22 next last
1
posted on
08/12/2003 12:44:29 AM PDT
by
kattracks
To: kattracks
Awww... AOL can't gain revenue being part of Time Warner?? No wonder they're pushing to hit the delete button... not that I feel at all sorry for them.
2
posted on
08/12/2003 12:46:18 AM PDT
by
goldstategop
(In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives On In My Heart Forever)
To: kattracks
What goes around comes around....
To: kattracks
So here's the question:
Will it go to aohell, or just purgatory?
To: kattracks
So, AOL is SOL?
5
posted on
08/12/2003 12:48:32 AM PDT
by
onyx
(Name an honest democrat? I can't either!)
To: Unknown Freeper
Steve Case's company was over-inflated in value due no doubt to the dot.com bubble craze. When it finally crashed no wonder the online service's value tanked. Its a mystery why none of the principal players involved saw it coming.
6
posted on
08/12/2003 12:48:44 AM PDT
by
goldstategop
(In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives On In My Heart Forever)
To: EternalVigilance
It'll be around. Its too big to die but it won't push the new media thingy for a long time yet. As it was it turned out to be one of those ideas ahead of its time. Someday someone will get a media synergy concept right but it won't be AOL who'll get it done.
7
posted on
08/12/2003 12:50:36 AM PDT
by
goldstategop
(In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives On In My Heart Forever)
To: goldstategop
You may be right. I was just looking for any excuse to call it 'aohell'.
LOL...
To: goldstategop
It had hype and momentum. When you have that people will suspend all critical reasoning in a desire to jump on the bandwagon.
9
posted on
08/12/2003 1:01:38 AM PDT
by
ambrose
To: goldstategop
Steve Case's company was over-inflated in value due no doubt to the dot.com bubble craze. When it finally crashed no wonder the online service's value tanked. Its a mystery why none of the principal players involved saw it coming.Steve Case saw it coming. That was his plan all along; ride the wave until AOL's value was so grossly inflated that it could eat a legitimate company with an actual business model. After that, AOL's inevitable collapse would be the combined company's problem. Which is exactly what happened.
Steve Case may have lost his job, but he walked away richer than when he started. If AOL had stayed independent, it probably wouldn't exist today.
10
posted on
08/12/2003 1:22:33 AM PDT
by
Timesink
To: kattracks
I have 'Tx3'
It does the job and that's all I want.
To: goldstategop
"Steve Case's company was over-inflated in value due no doubt to the dot.com bubble craze. When it finally crashed no wonder the online service's value tanked. Its a mystery why none of the principal players involved saw it coming."
Based on the accounting fraud e.g., overbooking revenue etc., etc., etc., I think they did. Case was trying to hold it all together until he could get away with the very big chunk of cash he did.
By the way, I will bet anyone on this forum that he does not own a single share of AOL Time Warner at this time.
Regards,
12
posted on
08/12/2003 3:45:11 AM PDT
by
Jimmy Valentine
(DemocRATS - when they speak, they lie; when they are silent, they are stealing the American Dream)
To: Timesink
Sorry. Didn't see your post until after I posted.
Great minds really do think alike don't they? [self effacing modesty turned back on]
13
posted on
08/12/2003 3:47:42 AM PDT
by
Jimmy Valentine
(DemocRATS - when they speak, they lie; when they are silent, they are stealing the American Dream)
To: goldstategop
But what about all those millions of disks in the mail?
They're sure to bring in oodles of new customers. (snicker)
14
posted on
08/12/2003 3:52:38 AM PDT
by
Bullish
To: kattracks
How did AOL buy TIME Warner?
To: kattracks
Does this mean they will be dropping their other embarressments, Ted Turner & CNN also?
16
posted on
08/12/2003 5:13:45 AM PDT
by
Beck_isright
(Shenandoah and Blue Ridge will re-emerge as the investment of the 21st Century....)
To: goldstategop
I always thought of them as LOL as opposed to AOL.
17
posted on
08/12/2003 5:52:50 AM PDT
by
capt. norm
(How many of you believe in telekinesis? Raise my hand...)
To: EternalVigilance
Will it go to aohell, or just purgatory?
That depends on how many aolindulgences are sold, who buys them, and how much they are valued.
18
posted on
08/12/2003 5:58:08 AM PDT
by
AD from SpringBay
(We have the government we allow and deserve.)
To: kattracks; Timesink
Since the takeover, the combined company has lost close to $200 billion in market value and seen its employees' retirement accounts - mostly made up of company stock - get decimated.
And the fact that the service is crappy, slow, intrusive, and riddled with security holes has absolutely nothing to do with it.
I would add that if AOL employees are foolish enough to have their retirement accounts mostly in AOL stock, as the article states, they deserve the losses that are coming to them.
19
posted on
08/12/2003 6:06:45 AM PDT
by
Xenalyte
(I may not agree with your bumper sticker, but I'll defend to the death your right to stick it)
To: Bullish
But what about all those millions of disks in the mail?I have the 8.0 coaster. Iced tea weather down here in Texas, ya' know, but the AOL disk does a GREAT job keeping the moisture off of my solid oak desk.
Do I have the latest version? Or is it time to uprade.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-22 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson