Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Running Man Hasn’t Won Yet: Don’t believe the CNN-Time recall poll.
National Review Online ^ | August 11, 2003 | Arnold Steinberg

Posted on 08/11/2003 2:18:28 PM PDT by nickcarraway

The word is that Arnold Schwarzenegger has the race all locked up.

Don't believe it.

Governor Gray Davis may indeed be recalled. And Arnold Schwarzenegger may in fact become governor. But neither outcome is preordained.

The CNN-Time poll released this weekend has received international coverage. It shows the recall comfortably ahead, and Schwarzenegger clearly out in front. The Terminator already is at 25 percent, compared to Democrat Cruz Bustamante at 15 percent, Republican Tom McClintock at 9 percent, Republican Bill Simon at 7 percent, and independent Arianna Huffington, Republican Peter Ueberroth, and Democrat Larry Flynt tied at 4 percent each. Democrat Garamendi, also at 4 percent, has already dropped out of the race.

But here's why those numbers are off the mark.

First, the recall itself: The same poll shows respondents about evenly split on whether the recall is a good idea. And it shows 39 percent of Democrats favoring the recall, a percentage unlikely to hold as Democrats go partisan.

It's true that Davis is profoundly unpopular. And his negatives are mainly irreversible. But Davis still has an outside chance to defeat the recall on October 7. Besides, if a federal court postpones the special recall election to coincide with the March Democratic presidential primary, Davis probably would be retained.

There never was a strategy for the recall. Absent the intervention (i.e., money) of U.S. Congressman Darrell Issa (R.), the recall would have fallen flat. Nor was there ever serious research behind the effort. Indeed, the widely leaked results of pro-recall focus groups were based on a dubious premise: that Davis himself would make his case. The focus groups tested videotapes of Davis making arguments against the recall. This is amateurish. Davis is, after all, at issue. If Davis announced that two and two is four, the focus-group panelists would have reacted negatively. In a skillful campaign, anti-recall surrogates will say that Davis is a jerk, but that the recall is a bad idea.

It remains to be seen whether Democrats can portray the recall as a farce. But doing so successfully would help defeat the it. Certainly, no one expects people to vote against the recall because they like Gray Davis.

There's a chance this election could resemble a ballot initiative more than a candidate race. If so, the burden of proof is placed on the "yes" side. In other words, recall proponents seek a change in the status quo. They could be defeated if voters feel that a recall would not be a change for the better; the recall must show light at the end of the tunnel, not simply getting the rascal out.

Second, what about the candidates? The CNN-Time poll was a one-night sample, allowing for a limited sampling, no callbacks. It was taken Friday night — all the eggs in one basket on the worst evening of the week. No one yet (if ever) can predict the likely turnout of registered voters for this special election, nor their composition. For example, we don't know whether Schwarzenegger will increase turnout dramatically to his benefit, or he'll simply raise the profile of the election, insuring more Democrats who will help Davis.

Nor did this poll allow for the impact of voting by mail. In past special elections, half the vote was by absentee voters. They could be older and conservative, more likely to benefit Bill Simon or Tom McClintock.

Finally, the poll itself was taken in the midst of the euphoria surrounding the Schwarzenegger announcement. It did not even list the political party of each candidate. Thus, Democrats did not know, for example, that Schwarzenegger is a Republican, or Bustamante is a Democrat. Does that partly explain how Bustamante gets 15 percent of the vote in a state where Democrats comprise 45 percent of voters?

This poll is not good news for Schwarzenegger, because it puts him on too high a pedestal.

— Arnold Steinberg is a California political strategist and pollster.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; Editorial; Extended News; Politics/Elections; US: California
KEYWORDS: allornothinglosers; arnoldwillwin; california; goarnoldgo; keysters; losers4mcclintock; mcclintockistas; recalldavis; schwarzenegger; vote4arnold; winners4arnold
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-36 next last

1 posted on 08/11/2003 2:18:30 PM PDT by nickcarraway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Canticle_of_Deborah
ping
2 posted on 08/11/2003 2:18:46 PM PDT by nickcarraway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway
This poll is not good news for Schwarzenegger, because it puts him on too high a pedestal.

And if Arnold had come in at 7%, Steinberg would be saying it's not good news because it shows he has no support.

Steinberg is likely working for Simon or McClintock.

3 posted on 08/11/2003 2:23:46 PM PDT by sinkspur (Get a dog! He'll change your life!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway
I forgot about Running Man.  Ha!  Running Man, Total Recall.  This is an election just for Arnold!

 

4 posted on 08/11/2003 2:24:09 PM PDT by Incorrigible
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway
"— Arnold Steinberg is a California political strategist and pollster."

Whatever, Arnie. Dream on if you think Davis can avoid the recall.

Arnold S. will also be elected.
5 posted on 08/11/2003 2:25:24 PM PDT by truth_seeker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway
I agree with his points. First, I'm still not convinced there'll be a yes on recall. Second, I think Schwarzenegger has probably peaked already.
6 posted on 08/11/2003 2:26:30 PM PDT by lasereye
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway
Thanks for a well reasoned article. Time will tell.
7 posted on 08/11/2003 2:27:44 PM PDT by Canticle_of_Deborah (A fiscally conservative social liberal is an oxymoron)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: truth_seeker
"Better a circus than a whorehouse"

---John & Ken Show KFI, Aug 8, 2003
8 posted on 08/11/2003 2:28:00 PM PDT by Republicus2001
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway
Absent the intervention (i.e., money) of U.S. Congressman Darrell Issa (R.), the recall would have fallen flat.

That's not true, right there, so I think the rest may be B.S., also.

9 posted on 08/11/2003 2:28:18 PM PDT by Saundra Duffy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rabid Republican; Pubbie
Ping
10 posted on 08/11/2003 2:28:31 PM PDT by Canticle_of_Deborah (A fiscally conservative social liberal is an oxymoron)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lasereye
I'm convinced there will be a Yes vote on the recall, but I think Bustamante could certainly win, especially if all three Republicans remain in the race.
11 posted on 08/11/2003 2:28:55 PM PDT by dead (Perdicaris alive or Raisuli dead!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway
Hi, pal. I heard that Arnold came out AGAINST partial birth abortion and FOR parental consent for abortion. Have you heard that? If true, that would make him a little more acceptable to the conservatives. It looks to me like he's IN LIKE FLYNN but I'm still going to vote for Tom McClintock.
12 posted on 08/11/2003 2:29:41 PM PDT by Saundra Duffy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway
The caveats are all to the good. We should not be swept away in the euphoria of the moment. At the same time I take issue with Arnold Steinberg's contention the recall doesn't have legs. There have been similar drives launched against previous California governors and NONE of them made the ballot. Darrel Issa's money helped spur a cause that seemed to go like all the others before it, but the money alone nor a widespread and deep dislike of Gray Davis accounts for its unexpected success. The recall election is basically when all is said and done, a vote of no confidence in the state's political establishment. Normally the "YES" side has to work harder to convince voters why its necessary to change. In the present situation, its reversed. The "NO" side has the burden of demonstrating why things would get worse if the governor were removed from office. They can't which is obvious to every one who sees what's going on. No one is saying AS is a shoo-in. Steinberg would be right if the CNN-Time poll predicted a pre-ordained outcome. But at the same time, its clear that Gray Davis is finished here as Governor. The only real question is who will replace him and I suspect we'll find out the answer on October 7th.
13 posted on 08/11/2003 2:32:26 PM PDT by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives On In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway
Unfortunately for this typist (author), there has already been a 3-day poll, eclipsing the first one. In the 3-day Gallup Poll, the recall has over 60% yes, and Ah-nold is up to 48% with no one else in double digits.

This guy also probably predicted a "quagmire."

Michael

14 posted on 08/11/2003 2:33:13 PM PDT by Wright is right! (Have a profitable day!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway
My reply:
I have to differ. First off, when talking about Cruz Bustamante, the poll identified him as the current Lieutenant Governor. Democrats knew he was a Democrat.

As for the euphoria comment, it is a fair one, but I am not sure how much weight should be placed on it. The mainstream media fixates on favorable numbers, but often the real tale is in the unfavorable numbers.

For Arnie, 6% said there is not much chance they would vote for him, and 24% said there was no chance. There is only 30% of the likely vote which is out of his grasp.

In comparison, for Bustamante, 8% also said there was not much of a chance they would vote for him, but a whopping 47% said no chance.

And if we go by registered voters rather than likely, Arnold's negatives are only 35% while Cruz's are 50%.

That is a huge difference. It is very unlikely to be a mirage. And the only other candidate with low negatives? Richard Riordan, who was included in the poll on the possibility he might run. His negatives were 40% of registered voters and 33% of likely voters. But who benefits the most by Riordan not running?

The man he endorsed.

That Gallup poll does not show weakness for Schwarzenegger. It shows tremendous strength.

Disclaimer: I do not live in California. If I did, at this point I would be supporting either McClintock or Uebberoth (I don't know enough about his social views). But if I did live in California, and come election day the poll numbers looked like this, I would go and vote Arnold.
15 posted on 08/11/2003 2:33:46 PM PDT by William McKinley (Vote Clinton Off: http://williammckinley.blogspot.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Saundra Duffy
I haven't heard that, but I'd like to hear exactly what his positions are. Yes, right now he is the frontrunner, but anything can happen. And don't forget, the current governor may be a lousy job, but he's fantastic at trashing his opponents. He is probably going to havev a few tricks up his sleave before all is said and done.
16 posted on 08/11/2003 2:35:22 PM PDT by nickcarraway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: lasereye
Look at the trend - in a couple of weeks, recall has gone from 51% for to 65% for in the latest poll. That's quite a shift, and indicates that the only people opposing the recall are the State workers who feel (quite rightly) that their jobs are on the line.

It seems most likely that Arnold will win the recall - I would certainly not bet against him - but no, it's not sewn up. Nothing this unpredictable ever is. I would like to see Arnold introduce himself to the voters, up close and personal. (His fundraiser would probably have to be in the Colosseum to house all the people wanting to come!)

So yes, one never knows. But it does look really, really good for him.

D
17 posted on 08/11/2003 2:35:39 PM PDT by daviddennis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Republicus2001
"Better a circus than a whorehouse"

---John & Ken Show KFI, Aug 8, 2003

Bears repeating. This soundbite, obviously a John Kobylt special, says it all.

18 posted on 08/11/2003 2:36:23 PM PDT by Yaelle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: lasereye
Actually, Arnold's numbers might go up as more and more supporters of McClintock and Simon come to realize that a vote for either is really going to be a vote for Boosta-montez
19 posted on 08/11/2003 2:37:51 PM PDT by rodeo-mamma
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: sinkspur
He didn't say there is bad news for Arnold, just that a lot can happen between now and the election. I think it's naive to believe everything is a forgone conclusion. Who knows what could happen. Plus, you may not realize, Gray Davis will not go down without a fight, and this guy knows dirty tricks. And you may not know how easy voter fraud is in California. How we vote may have little to do with the final result. (BTW, in last years primary, R. Riordan started out with a 45-3 lead, and lost by a lot)
20 posted on 08/11/2003 2:38:09 PM PDT by nickcarraway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-36 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson