Replies

Nope. Nothing quite so sinister. Let 'em stay in their monogomous relationships (beacuse of course most of them ARE monogomous) and try as they may, it just won't happen. God (oops -- I know you don't believe in Him, but I do!) didn't create humankind to reproduce naturally in that type of relationship.

"Nope. Nothing quite so sinister. Let 'em stay in their monogomous relationships (beacuse of course most of them ARE monogomous) and try as they may, it just won't happen. God (oops -- I know you don't believe in Him, but I do!) didn't create humankind to reproduce naturally in that type of relationship.
"

"Let 'em stay....?" What? How is it your job to let anyone do anything about their personal relationships. How about "letting" heterosexuals stay in their monogamous relationships. They ain't doing such a good job of it, near as I can tell.

The problem is that you want to control someone else's reproductive life. That's not going to happen, unless you change our Constitution in ways nobody's going to support.

How about leaving folks alone to carry on their private lives as they choose? How about granting others the same respect you want for yourself? How about letting your deity take care of sin instead of taking the job on for yourself?

What you're saying is so far from conservatism that I can't even begin to express it.

You don't get to "let" people do anything regarding their reproduction. It's not your job.