Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: CWOJackson
Sorry, chief. You miss the point.

He said that it was a decision for locals to make about how they wished to regulate behaviors that could impact on others.

Do you think the state has the mandate to debate behaviors that could impact on others? If so, then they have the mandate to regulate them.

16 posted on 08/11/2003 12:32:38 PM PDT by xzins
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]


To: xzins
"Do you think the state has the mandate to debate behaviors that could impact on others?"

Not when it's done in the privacy of my own home between two consenting adults...not at all. The state has no right to trample my Constitutional rights in that way.

21 posted on 08/11/2003 12:42:17 PM PDT by CWOJackson (The World According to Garp isn't that bad when compared with The World According to Todd.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson