Replies

Heh! Are you sure that this is still microevolution? I'd rather call that hyper-evolution if you think that all these subspecies evolved in less than 6000 years from only a few specimen that were on the ark.

LOL, you're out of your mind. The explosion in diversity of floral options in the past 50 years is proof enough of that. Cross breeding has caused astonishing things to happen. It isn't the possibility that is a problem, it is your opposition to the possibility that is problematic. You need to learn something about diversity studies. I'm trying to remember the exact numbers but I believe someone noted that all the diversity in human races from skin tone to eye color to height could be achieved in a remarkable few generations because of the way dna works. I believe it was 8 generations; but, I'd have to go looking - been too long. Anyone know the numbers off hand to correct me here?

I'd rather call that hyper-evolution if you think that all these subspecies evolved in less than 6000 years from only a few specimen that were on the ark.

Well, that's because you postulate in evolution that it takes millions of years. Like it takes eons to make a stalactite or stalagmite, when it only takes a few. Like maybe a few decades, depending on the size.