It has been easy, it's only been posted to FR countless times and seems to come up in most every debate. Just happens I'm talking between calls at work and don't have the link here. It's one of the leading reasons for debate on a number of fronts and has been attempted to be explained away in some rather creative ways.
I am neither a liberal not an atheist, and resent the ad hominem attack
It's not an ad hominem attack. Soo willing to play the martyr and root for someone's sympathy as though you were being maligned. Give us a break.
Previous papers from Dr. Humphreys, one of which I critiqued in detail some months ago, were shoddy in methodology and data analysis
Heard this one before too. Amazing how you require proof on something that is published and then expect to be taken at face value on something that is not when your ideology is at question. Hmm. Seems like the same doublestandard I'm accustomed to. And the same "take my opinion, please" proof that I'm used to.
The cure for shoddy science is people that examine the science. Just like the cure for certain religions claiming to be Christian is scripture. The public is largely dumb and unaware. That is the only reason charlotans thrive. But when they start getting a little educated, the lights come on and the liberals and evolutionists scurry back under the cabinets - albeit screaming - they scurry nonetheless.
... Just happens I'm talking between calls at work and don't have the link here...
Dog ate your homework. Yeah yeah. Get back to me when you decide to take some responsibility for what you post.
I am neither a liberal not an atheist, and resent the ad hominem attack
It's not an ad hominem attack. Soo willing to play the martyr and root for someone's sympathy as though you were being maligned. Give us a break.
Then you, sir, are an urepentent liar.
But when they start getting a little educated, the lights come on and the liberals and evolutionists scurry back under the cabinets - albeit screaming - they scurry nonetheless.
He can't come up with the material to which he referred; he flung set of lies he won't retract; and now he says we're scurrying!
Any time you have something of substance to post, instead of this vacuous chest-beating intended to distract from your post's lotal lack of content, get back to me, blowhard.