Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Shenzhou-5 Launcher Ready For Transfer To Jiuquan Launch Site
spacedaily.com ^ | 11 Aug 03 | Hou Yi

Posted on 08/11/2003 8:52:23 AM PDT by RightWhale

Shenzhou-5 Launcher Ready For Transfer To Jiuquan Launch Site

by Hou Yi, Hong Kong - Aug 11, 2003

The Changzheng-2F (Long March-2F) launcher that will deliver the Shenzhou-5 spacecraft into orbit will likely be ready to leave for the launch center within the last ten days of this month, local newspaper Ta Kung Pao reported on Sunday (Aug. 3).

According to sources at the Chinese Academy of Launch Vehicle Technology (CALT), which is the manufacturer of CZ-2F in Beijing, a team of technicians would accompany the shipment of the launcher to the Jiuquan Satellite Launch Centre (JSLC) in the northwestern Gansu Province.

Two days earlier (Aug. 1) the newspaper also reported that both the SZ-5 spacecraft and the CZ-2F launcher had been undergoing rigorous reexamination ahead of their imminent departure to the launch site. The examination covered all aspects of the vehicles, including areas of technology that had already reached maturity in the first Shenzhou flight.

Unidentified officials at the China Aerospace Science and Technology Corporation (CASC) said that in order to ensure a perfectly safe flight for the historic manned mission, processing work on other Changzheng rockets for missions later this year was stopped so that all resources would be devoted to test both SZ-5 and CZ-2F. This is the first time that CASC and CALT add the rechecking of the Shenzhou spacecraft and its launcher prior to their delivery to the launch center.

The forthcoming transfer of the launcher to JSLC signifies that preparation of the SZ-5 mission is about to enter its final phase. The report on Sunday in Ta Kung Pao also cited information from unnamed space officials that the launch window of SZ-5 might be around 6 a.m. Beijing Time (10pm UTC on previous day). Two weeks ago Wen Wei Po, another newspaper in Hong Kong, reported that the launch of SZ-5 could happen within 100 days from now .

Space officials told Wen Wei Po back then that the launch of SZ-5 would occur in daylight. All four previous launches of unmanned Shenzhou test missions took place at night since the bright rocket plume made optical tracking easier. One of the main reasons for a day launch of SZ-5, according to the space officials, is that the warmer daytime temperature would improve the working conditions for ground personnel and thereby "further adequately guarantee the safety of the yuhangyuan ('astronaut')".

A daytime launch would also greatly improve the operation in locating and rescuing the mission crew should an emergency develop during launch. However, the latest news of a launch in the pre-sunrise part of the day seems to negate the idea of working in a warmer environment for the final hours of the launch countdown. Furthermore as there is only a single time zone for the entire country, the amount of daylight available at 6 a.m. at JSLC is less than that at the same time in areas further east. In fact the sky would not even reach morning twilight at 6 a.m. at JSLC in late October, the suggested timeframe of the SZ-5 launch. But space officials explained to Ta Kung Pao that many factors would go into considering the launch window of SZ-5. Besides the environmental element, a factor that would have to be taken into account is the amount of solar illumination that would be available to the solar arrays on Shenzhou once the spacecraft reaches orbit. These space officials felt that a launch near 6 a.m. would be "the most favourable" in this respect.

CREW SIZE, MISSION DETAILS REMAIN UNKNOWN

Chinese space officials have remained silent about the crew size and details of the mission, such as its duration and orbital altitude. Wen Wei Po reported two weeks ago that space officials had determined which yuhangyuan would pilot SZ-5. But there was no mention of the crew size of the mission.

As far back as Feb. 15, the Commander-in-Chief of the Chinese manned spaceflight application system Zhang Houying had said in a public lecture in Beijing that a simpler and shorter duration mission would be more appropriate for SZ-5. "As to how many persons [on SZ-5], presently is not the time to announce; but definitely the simpler the better. The number of days that the yuhangyuan crew stays in space will not be long either and would also be better to be simpler," said Zhang. He added that there would be three seats on SZ-5 but he was certain that there would not be three yuhangyuans on the mission.

Other unidentified Chinese space specialists had said in an interview with Wen Wei Po on Feb. 25 that they speculated SZ-5 would involve only a single yuhangyuan on a one-day mission.

Among the four unmanned test missions of Shenzhou, only the inaugural flight ended within 24 hours. After completing fourteen orbits SZ-1 returned successfully to the designated landing site in Inner Mongolia on Nov. 20, 1999; twenty-one hours after its liftoff. Zhang also said in the public lecture that SZ-5 would not carry any science experiment, other than all the necessary instruments that would be required for the safe operation of the spacecraft.

He explained that additional science equipment could interfere with the activities of the yuhangyuan in the relatively tight quarters of the Shenzhou capsule. According to Zhang there would be only a space of 2.5 meters long and 2.2 meters wide available to the yuhangyuan to live and work inside the capsule.

But Zhang revealed that a science payload, a CCD camera, would be mounted to the exterior of SZ-5. "The externally mounted camera is called a CCD transmission camera, with a ground resolution of 1.6 meter. Its main use will be in military reconnaissance," Zhang told the audience of more than 200 at the lecture. "Other than that, the objective of SZ-5 is to guarantee the safe launch and return of the yuhangyuan."

The resolution of the SZ-5 external CCD camera, interestingly, is very similar to the 1.8-meter imaging resolution of the Israeli remote sensing satellite EROS-A1.

During the lecture Zhang displayed slides and computer animations to illustrate the Shenzhou spacecraft and its operation. One animation showed the overall configuration of SZ-5, which would be mostly identical to SZ-4 with the exception of two areas. The forward end of SZ-5 would be cylindrical in shape instead of the hemispheric shape on SZ-4, and a docking unit for a future orbiting spacelab would be installed on SZ-5. Zhang said that the basic mission operation of SZ-5 would be the same as on SZ-4. His comment suggested that SZ-5 might settle in an operational circular orbit of 343 km, the orbital altitude of SZ-4. He said that SZ-5 would blast off from JSLC. A network of 12 tracking stations, including the fleet of four Yuanwang (YW) tracking vessels, would follow the mission closely. Tracking from land will be the duty of the Beijing Aerospace Command and Control Center (BACCC), the Xi'an Satellite Control Centre (XSCC) in Shaanxi Province, and the tracking stations in Weinan (Shaanxi Province), Qingdao (Shandong Province), Xiamen (Fujian Province), Kashi (Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region), Karachi (Pakistan), and Swakopmund (Namibia).

The four Yuanwang tracking vessels will station at the Sea of Japan (YW-1), area off the southern tip of South America (YW-2), Atlantic Ocean (YW-3) and Indian Ocean off Australia (YW-4) respectively.

Like the previous four Shenzhou missions, YW-3 will have the critical role of issuing the reentry command to SZ-5 for its return to Earth. The Descent Module of SZ-5 would aim to touch down at its primary landing site in Gobi Desert, near the town of Bawang Qi in Nei Mongol (Inner Mongolia) Autonomous Region. The backup landing site is at JSLC.


TOPICS: Extended News; Foreign Affairs; Government; Technical
KEYWORDS: china; space; taikonaut; yuhangyuan
China tends not to have individual heroes, so there would be little danger of this yuhangyuan turning into another John Glenn.
1 posted on 08/11/2003 8:52:24 AM PDT by RightWhale
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: KevinDavis
countdown ping
2 posted on 08/11/2003 8:53:08 AM PDT by RightWhale (Repeal the Law of the Excluded Middle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RightWhale
bump
3 posted on 08/11/2003 9:01:05 AM PDT by kimosabe31
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: belmont_mark
PING!
4 posted on 08/11/2003 11:34:11 AM PDT by Orion78 (FREE IRAN!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Normal4me; RightWhale; demlosers; Prof Engineer; BlazingArizona; ThreePuttinDude; Brett66; ...
I hope this kicks our butts and start taking space travel seriously.

Space Ping! This is the space ping list! Let me know if you want on or off this list!
5 posted on 08/11/2003 5:01:02 PM PDT by KevinDavis (Let the meek inherit the Earth, the rest of us will explore the stars!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KevinDavis
Add me.

Competition spurs innovation.

Innovate or die.
6 posted on 08/11/2003 5:13:09 PM PDT by Central Scrutiniser (My only desire is to pester Mojo and Nick.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: KevinDavis
Serious indeed.

As much as we can detest the political system that is used to run China, we have to give them credit for having the fortitude and drive to do things we are seemingly no longer willing to do.

Granted, this is a baby step compared to what we have accomplished in the past -- but all of our manned flight achievements are just that -- past.

The ChiComs are moving into space. A manned flight this year, a space station later, and then on to the moon. And, I will be very suprised if they stop there.

Unless we get off our laurels and start advancing again, we are probably going to see China zoom into the lead and stay there.
7 posted on 08/11/2003 5:14:37 PM PDT by Ronin (Qui tacet consentit!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Ronin
There are some freepers who don't agree with you (I"m not one of them)... We better get our heads out of our collective ass.
8 posted on 08/11/2003 5:35:52 PM PDT by KevinDavis (Let the meek inherit the Earth, the rest of us will explore the stars!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Ronin
we are probably going to see China zoom into the lead and stay there

Odds are that will be the way it goes.

9 posted on 08/11/2003 5:59:35 PM PDT by RightWhale (Repeal the Law of the Excluded Middle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: RightWhale
I'm afraid you are right.. Americans care more about the Kobe Bryant case than they do about space travel.
10 posted on 08/11/2003 6:15:01 PM PDT by KevinDavis (Let the meek inherit the Earth, the rest of us will explore the stars!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: RightWhale
Lots of loss of face if this thing fails, heads will roll.
11 posted on 08/11/2003 6:16:30 PM PDT by tet68
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RightWhale; Ronin; KevinDavis; Central Scrutiniser; Orion78; kimosabe31; tet68; Brett66
Odds are that will be the way it goes.

I too am afraid this the case. :-(

12 posted on 08/11/2003 6:27:07 PM PDT by RadioAstronomer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: tet68
No doubt about that. But even if it fails, it won't stop them from trying again. And again, and again.
13 posted on 08/11/2003 6:42:48 PM PDT by Ronin (Qui tacet consentit!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: RadioAstronomer
I don't think there's a need for pessimism yet. China has these grandiose plans with a twenty year timeframe. There's no way of knowing what reality in the aerospace field will dominate then. I'm increasingly lead to believe they will succumb to massive beaurocrat bloat when they get to the "space shuttle" stage of their plan. Costs,complexity, and a host of other issues will begin to dog them eventually. It's no big deal to put humans in LEO, but when they introduce complex rendevous missions, reusability, etc., they're going to hit some obstacles.

We do have a good jumpstart on them in another way, we have witnessed the triumph and the failure of government programs to deliver on the dream of space. Many in private industry have learned these lessons and we're about to see hardware start flying soon that could take advantage of new markets.

China understands the sattelite launch market, but they don't understand space tourism, LEO hotels etc. as well as we do. It's not NASA's game to win anyomore, it's up to people like Rutan,Bezos,Musk, etc. to win this race and we are ahead of them. As soon as hardware starts flying, probably later this year, a lot of changes will start occuring fairly rapidly. The X-Prize will soon be won and I believe a lot of investor interest will pick up when this starts happening. The biggest obstacle of having enough capital for these private ventures will soon be resolved. Once that happens, the dam breaks and we embark on a post-NASA future. Hard to predict what will happen then, but we could accomplish more in the next 15 years than we accomplished in the last 40.

14 posted on 08/11/2003 6:47:14 PM PDT by Brett66
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Ronin
We need a common project to really jump science forward again. Something lofty, like a crash-course for fusion energy, a space elevator, or along those lines. We need to have some kind of great goal so that we all of the best of motivation. The Chinese have their goal, but they also have the ability to mass-coerce workers.
15 posted on 08/11/2003 6:48:55 PM PDT by July 4th
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Ronin
With my tinfoil hat firmly in place I would like to bring up the timing coincedence between China's planned first manned space-launch and our manned space program(shuttles) being grounded. The two events were not too far apart and if I am not mistaken the investigation into the Columbia tragedy named the loose or broken off piece of foam as the culprit. My question is it conceivable that a Chinese agent could have sabotaged the takeoff with a previously researched knowledge of how to effectively damage one of our shuttles significantly enough for it to be destroyed in takeoff or upon reentry but also in a way as to mask their efforts in the process? This would maximize the effect of their mission by making us do an investigation(which we did) and making it a possibility that we would ground all our other shuttles(which we did). The Chinese would clearly have something to gain from this happening and in fact have gained something already in time. Time they will use to advance their own manned and unmanned space programs and to gain ground in the very important space race all while keeping the military potential of space in mind.

....long day.....I should have some good dreams tonight.
16 posted on 08/11/2003 6:56:33 PM PDT by fiftymegaton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Ronin
"As much as we can detest the political system that is used to run China, we have to give them credit for having the fortitude and drive to do things we are seemingly no longer willing to do."

????
Put a Man in space?

Just ribbin ya....dont sweat it...once our space program gets some real competition it'll get it together.

17 posted on 08/11/2003 7:09:42 PM PDT by VaBthang4 (Could someone show me one [1] Loserdopian elected to the federal government?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Brett66
I hope the X-Prize boosts the manned side back into a huge sucess! :-) Would be something to have a real lunar base.
18 posted on 08/11/2003 8:30:05 PM PDT by RadioAstronomer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: RightWhale
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/962134/posts
19 posted on 08/11/2003 8:56:46 PM PDT by fiftymegaton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson