[chachacha]

But Democrats were quick to jump on the disclosure as a chink in the action hero's armor.

But, This republican was quick to jump on his liberal policies on liberal social issues. Such as.

Abortion

Gay rights

Gun Control

Just to name a few!

Why can't we conservatives seem to look for someone who can not only balance a budget but, also has some moral social POLICIES?

Thanks to this kind of people picking we ended up with the a Supreme Court that done more damage to this country then all the liberals combined.

Picking winners is not a great republican asset. They win short term but, lose long term. Arnold is an example.

Lets not tell me he's only running for governor and that will nor influence the moral deacay of this nation. If he can collect money in New York he can influence policy also.

[Dave S]

Picking winners is not a great republican asset. They win short term but, lose long term. Arnold is an example.

And Simon, Fong, Hershenson, Huffington, and the others werent?

[GrandMoM]

McCLINTOCK BUMP

[Afronaut]

How dare you have a real conviction! In 20 years there will be no conservatives left,, only "Winners" It's not worth it.

But no one cares.

[kellynla]

Aunold? We don't have time to train a governor. Aunold has no credentials, no experience and is ceratinly not qualified to run CA. Serious Republicans have a serious candidate for governor of CA. And that candidate is Tom McClintock. He is the only candidate who has a proposal to balance the budget and do so without raising taxes and/or fees. If you go to http://www.krla870.com you can listen to a re-broadcast of Tom McClintock's intervisw this am. It was an excellent interview where Mac laid out his proposals to balance the budget, rescind the 42 billion dollar electrical contracts and reverse the triple car tax. And do that before lunch! Aunold would still be working out! The interview was at 7:45am