Skip to comments.
Mel Gets Hell On His ‘Passion’
jewish week ^
| (07/04/2003)
| Eric J. Greenberg
Posted on 08/11/2003 7:39:54 AM PDT by dennisw
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-95 next last
1
posted on
08/11/2003 7:39:54 AM PDT
by
dennisw
To: dennisw
Don't mess with Mother Church.
To: dennisw
...interfaith scholars...A group of weasely, liberals who believe that Jesus wears Nikes.
To: dennisw
OUCH! Truth hurts.
4
posted on
08/11/2003 7:56:01 AM PDT
by
Only1choice____Freedom
(If everything you experienced, believed, lived was a lie, would you want to know the truth?)
To: dennisw
I don't see Mel backing down now, and he would be crazy if he did.
All the ADL controversy is doing is making sure that this is the most popular movie Mel has ever made.
5
posted on
08/11/2003 7:56:04 AM PDT
by
Ronin
(Qui tacet consentit!)
To: dennisw
bump
6
posted on
08/11/2003 8:01:48 AM PDT
by
VOA
To: Ronin
I'm just wondering how accurate this "stolen script" really is.
Wouldn't it be hilarious if they were criticizing a completely different movie than the one released.
7
posted on
08/11/2003 8:09:10 AM PDT
by
TomB
To: dennisw
Let's see the movie and decide for ourselves. Prior restraint is not the American way. Where did the "nine interfaith scholars" get the draft manuscript, anyway? And where is their indignation at all the artistic and real-world perversions of scripture permeating western civilization? What a load of craap these pious psuedo-intellectuals are pushing.
8
posted on
08/11/2003 8:12:27 AM PDT
by
rmgatto
To: dennisw
Well, if the script was obtained with permission, proof of that permission would be an absolute defense.
9
posted on
08/11/2003 8:15:48 AM PDT
by
Petronski
(I'm not always cranky.)
To: dennisw
The film has been made and it looks like Mel has decided on what the final cut will look like since he's been testing it out to larger and larger audiences. All the ADL can do now is protest and create controversy.
To: Johnbalaya
So Mel should hire the ADL to do his press? To create a good pre-opening buzz?
11
posted on
08/11/2003 8:20:47 AM PDT
by
dennisw
(G_d is at war with Amalek for all generations)
To: JesseHousman
If the ADL doesn't like this flim they should make their own version, or just shut up. I'm getting a little tired of the whining myself.
Tell it like it was written Mel, we don't need a PC sanitized version.
12
posted on
08/11/2003 8:24:18 AM PDT
by
steve50
To: dennisw
replete with objectionable elements Cite one, please. What the heck is this anyway? The guy is making a movie, not writing history. And I'm willing to bet it will be far less offensive to Jews than the Last Temptation of Christ was to Christians.
To: dennisw
Can't we have a Jewish film on Samuel? Really, with the exception of King David its been all downhill for Jews since his time. We could get experts together to critique the film, and fight over nuance and translation and anti-Semitism and pro-Zionism, and what God told Samuel, and blasphemy, etc., etc.
14
posted on
08/11/2003 8:28:14 AM PDT
by
gaspar
To: dennisw
The charge that we stole [the script] is absurd and insulting, said the June 25 letter signed by Mary Boys of Union Theological Seminary, Philip Cunningham of Boston University, the Rev. John Pawlikowski of the Chicago Theological Union and the Rev. Lawrence Frizzell of Seton Hall University.
Notice the words used................they didn't deny it.
To: dennisw
So Mel should hire the ADL to do his press? To create a good pre-opening buzz? Now there's a thought... If the ADL et al really wanted to scuttle this movie, they'd be singing its praises from the rooftops. Because churchgoing Christians generally don't go by the word of biblical "scholars" and theologians. I can't speak for the Catholics, but the Baptists (2nd largest Christian group in the U.S.) don't trust the word of those who play fast and loose with the Bible, aka "Word of God", and would stay home in droves.
16
posted on
08/11/2003 8:29:17 AM PDT
by
wimpycat
(Down with Kooks and Kookery!)
To: dennisw
I would suspect the ADL considers the entire New Testament to be "anti-semitic". Don't they have anything better to do than attack Christians?
To: dennisw
the scholars unanimously agreed that the screenplay ... was replete with objectionable elements that would promote anti-Semitism.

Don't see this movie! Don't see this movie!
18
posted on
08/11/2003 8:31:13 AM PDT
by
Skooz
(Tagline removed by moderator)
To: dennisw
19
posted on
08/11/2003 8:35:46 AM PDT
by
ex-Texan
(My tag line is broken !)
To: dennisw
The essential point is ignored: how did they obtain the script? They won't say.
If my neighbor "borrows" a saw from my garage to use without asking my permission, I may not make a big deal of it. But if he borrows it in order to cut down my shade trees, I might be inclined to make a criminal case out of it.
Similarly, if the "scholars" had used the script for legitimate study instead of using it to publicly berate Mel Gibson as an anti-Semite, Mr. Gibson might have overlooked their theft.
20
posted on
08/11/2003 8:39:39 AM PDT
by
wideawake
(God bless our brave soldiers and their Commander in Chief)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-95 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson