[William McKinley]

Wilson's world view and Boot's are considerably different, unless you believe that Wilson's worldview is the same as Reagan's and both Roosevelts' (in which case, the designation is meaningless).

As a matter of fact, the very article you posted to has Boot rejecting much if not most of Wilson's worldview.

Yet you act as if it doesn't. I don't know why you are assuming, on a text based message board, that people cannot read. They can, and they can clearly see that you suffered from very poor reading comprehension on Boot's article, and have refused to back off of it.

[JohnGalt]

Why would a conservative of Boot's ilk even mention Wilson? Again, thou doth protest too much. Most neutral readers could plainly ascertain that Boot is attempting to reconcile the internationalist position as demonstrated by Woodrow Wilson to that of the conservative lexicon.

You can be a denialist all you want, it does not change the obvious.

Neither of the Roosevelts were particularly conservative on anything, and Teddy Roosevelt in particula did a lot of damage to the office by being such a public persona. Reagan simply held the office after over 100 years of generally declining Executive leadership.