[JohnGalt]

And yet you say you can see no real difference between your views and say, Michael Ledeen, Max Boot, Daniel Pipes, Bill Kristol...?

I can't say I follow you.

I'd file you under Victims of the Mainstream Right, as clearly I was wrong in the box I built for you, but why defend that bunch instead of your friends to the Hard Right who are Taft Republicans as well?

[William McKinley]

And yet you say you can see no real difference between your views and say

I said nothing of the sort, despite your efforts to try to put words in my mouth.

However, I will say out of those four, I often agree with Ledeen and Pipes, and rarely agree with Kristol, and am not familiar enough with the views of Boot to comment.

It seems that you are suggesting that there is no difference between the views of these four from each other, and also no difference in their views and those of Dick Cheney or Paul Wolfowitz. I would love to see you substantiate this view.

BTW, using Boot's argument (which you are backpedling from quickly, understandably), we would be forced to categorize Robert A. Taft as a 'soft-Wilsonian', since the good Senator was an advocate of international law and multinational organizations. But that's just piling on.