Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: StolarStorm
One thing though, I'm a fan of the US military. If a tax rebellion occured we'd have to kiss our defense goodbye. This is all well and good on a theoretical standpoint, but scary as hell in reality.... unless you are looking forward to anarchy.

We had a military that defeated the England twice, Spain, Mexico, and won a civil war without an income tax.* The chief purpose of the income tax is funding the welfare state. The legitimate functions of government don't need an income tax.

This case will likely not change anything, but even if it did the issue deserves serious discussion, not the sort of hysterics the democratic party uses for every issue.

*Income taxes were passed at times, but never made it throught the courts.

48 posted on 08/11/2003 7:54:51 AM PDT by hopespringseternal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies ]


To: hopespringseternal
The chief purpose of the income tax is funding the welfare state. The legitimate functions of government don't need an income tax.

I think this is the point that all the "this lady isn't paying her fair share" and "it will hurt the military" folks are missing.

The federal government was never intended to become what it has become. Perhaps the 16th Amendement (taxes) and 19th Amendemnt (direct election of Senators) are the two most damaging amendments to what the Founders originally intended (not to mention the drastic effects of the withholding tax).

The 16th amendment was ratified in 1913. Apparently, we went 124 years without having a federal income tax. It has been 90 years since its institution and resultant escalation. Are we more free now?

64 posted on 08/11/2003 8:12:36 AM PDT by mattdono
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson