Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

The attorney representing the Memphis pilot is from Milwaukee and maintains a practice here.
1 posted on 08/11/2003 7:12:44 AM PDT by ninenot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-39 next last
To: Eaker
ping
2 posted on 08/11/2003 7:16:00 AM PDT by thackney
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ninenot
A classic example that the media is neither 'conservative' or 'liberal' biased but it is 'statist' biased-- thanks for the find.
3 posted on 08/11/2003 7:18:26 AM PDT by JohnGalt (They're All Lying)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ninenot
Powder..Patch..Ball FIRE!

I'd like to see a transcript of this trial!

4 posted on 08/11/2003 7:19:27 AM PDT by BallandPowder
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ninenot
bump
5 posted on 08/11/2003 7:19:40 AM PDT by cookcounty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ninenot
This is hardly a sober, authoritative source.

By the author's logic, the jury which returned a not guilty verdict in the O. J. Simpson murder case intended to signal that murder should be legal.

6 posted on 08/11/2003 7:20:06 AM PDT by Mr. Lucky
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ninenot
a bump for good news
8 posted on 08/11/2003 7:23:32 AM PDT by Bill Davis FR
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ninenot
A Google News Search on "Kuglin" came up with two other postings:

IRS Loses Tax Case Against FedEx Pilot - Conspiracy Planet - http://www.conspiracyplanet.com/channel.cfm?channelid=111&contentid=909
IRS Loses a Big One - NewsMax.com - http://www.newsmax.com/showinsidecover.shtml?a=2003/8/9/164934

13 posted on 08/11/2003 7:27:10 AM PDT by alancarp (SItting Senators ought not cash in while under the public trust)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ninenot
I think it's time for everyone reading this to send a very polite letter to the IRS, telling them they read about the case in Memphis, and is it true that there is no section in the U.S. Tax Code that requires an individual citizen to pay federal income taxes?

Change the "is it" to "it is" and change the "?" at the end to a ".". To ask the IRS if what the jury/court already decided is true is just dumb. This is a fight. Someone just won. You don't ask the loser if the winner won. He's likely to lie or otherwise try to subtract from the victory of the winner.

14 posted on 08/11/2003 7:27:11 AM PDT by Jason_b
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ninenot
Guess this 'lady' thinks she is better than the rest of us... who have to pay her share. Hope she doesn't drive on the roads that she didn't help to pay for. Pure lunacy.
17 posted on 08/11/2003 7:29:22 AM PDT by StolarStorm
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ninenot
Things like this are why I think jury trials are a much better avenue for change than elections.

Doesn't matter who passes the laws, doesn't even matter if the prosecutor is right on the law, if juries refuse to convict.

20 posted on 08/11/2003 7:32:16 AM PDT by Tauzero (This was not the sand-people, this was the work of Imperial Storm Troopers: only they are so precise)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ninenot
This is why they have "tax courts" to try IRS cases.
21 posted on 08/11/2003 7:32:58 AM PDT by wjcsux
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ninenot
A big Yeeehaaa to ya, ms. kuglin
23 posted on 08/11/2003 7:35:45 AM PDT by Johnbalaya
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ninenot
Bump for later.
26 posted on 08/11/2003 7:36:40 AM PDT by Bikers4Bush
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ninenot
Good for Vernice..............I think. Are we now going to have to have a special session of Congress to pass a retro active tax package? God help us!
27 posted on 08/11/2003 7:37:21 AM PDT by Sunshine Sister
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ninenot
I imagine this came from the definition of the two words "income" and "wages". Somehow over the years, these two words have been redefined to mean the same thing. In reality, wages are a means of exchanging hours of labor for goods. Income is the difference a business has between revenue and expenses. The later supposedly is taxable while the first case is not.
30 posted on 08/11/2003 7:37:53 AM PDT by tang-soo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ninenot
BTTT
32 posted on 08/11/2003 7:38:59 AM PDT by StriperSniper (Make South Korea an island)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ninenot
He was clearly unable to produce a single section of the Tax Code to that end, and the jury was unanimous in clearing Kuglin of all charges against her. If the foregoing was not so, Kuglin would have been convicted.

The author assumes the lady was acquitted because she was not convicted. Wrong, there could very well be a hung jury here. The court docs on the PACER site have not been posted yet.

44 posted on 08/11/2003 7:52:32 AM PDT by RGSpincich
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ninenot
I heard it this morning on that awful Doug Steffen (sp) radio program
45 posted on 08/11/2003 7:53:08 AM PDT by mel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ninenot
Oops disregard previous post.
51 posted on 08/11/2003 7:57:04 AM PDT by RGSpincich
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ninenot
bump
52 posted on 08/11/2003 7:57:48 AM PDT by VOA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-39 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson