The attorney representing the Memphis pilot is from Milwaukee and maintains a practice here.
1 posted on
08/11/2003 7:12:44 AM PDT by
ninenot
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-39 next last
To: Eaker
ping
2 posted on
08/11/2003 7:16:00 AM PDT by
thackney
To: ninenot
A classic example that the media is neither 'conservative' or 'liberal' biased but it is 'statist' biased-- thanks for the find.
3 posted on
08/11/2003 7:18:26 AM PDT by
JohnGalt
(They're All Lying)
To: ninenot
Powder..Patch..Ball FIRE!
I'd like to see a transcript of this trial!
To: ninenot
bump
To: ninenot
This is hardly a sober, authoritative source.
By the author's logic, the jury which returned a not guilty verdict in the O. J. Simpson murder case intended to signal that murder should be legal.
6 posted on
08/11/2003 7:20:06 AM PDT by
Mr. Lucky
To: ninenot
a bump for good news
To: ninenot
A Google News Search on "Kuglin" came up with two other postings:
IRS Loses Tax Case Against FedEx Pilot - Conspiracy Planet - http://www.conspiracyplanet.com/channel.cfm?channelid=111&contentid=909
IRS Loses a Big One - NewsMax.com - http://www.newsmax.com/showinsidecover.shtml?a=2003/8/9/164934
13 posted on
08/11/2003 7:27:10 AM PDT by
alancarp
(SItting Senators ought not cash in while under the public trust)
To: ninenot
I think it's time for everyone reading this to send a very polite letter to the IRS, telling them they read about the case in Memphis, and
is it true that there is no section in the U.S. Tax Code that requires an individual citizen to pay federal income taxes
? Change the "is it" to "it is" and change the "?" at the end to a ".". To ask the IRS if what the jury/court already decided is true is just dumb. This is a fight. Someone just won. You don't ask the loser if the winner won. He's likely to lie or otherwise try to subtract from the victory of the winner.
14 posted on
08/11/2003 7:27:11 AM PDT by
Jason_b
To: ninenot
Guess this 'lady' thinks she is better than the rest of us... who have to pay her share. Hope she doesn't drive on the roads that she didn't help to pay for. Pure lunacy.
To: ninenot
Things like this are why I think
jury trials are a much better avenue for change than elections.
Doesn't matter who passes the laws, doesn't even matter if the prosecutor is right on the law, if juries refuse to convict.
20 posted on
08/11/2003 7:32:16 AM PDT by
Tauzero
(This was not the sand-people, this was the work of Imperial Storm Troopers: only they are so precise)
To: ninenot
This is why they have "tax courts" to try IRS cases.
21 posted on
08/11/2003 7:32:58 AM PDT by
wjcsux
To: ninenot
A big Yeeehaaa to ya, ms. kuglin
To: ninenot
Bump for later.
To: ninenot
Good for Vernice..............I think. Are we now going to have to have a special session of Congress to pass a retro active tax package? God help us!
To: ninenot
I imagine this came from the definition of the two words "income" and "wages". Somehow over the years, these two words have been redefined to mean the same thing. In reality, wages are a means of exchanging hours of labor for goods. Income is the difference a business has between revenue and expenses. The later supposedly is taxable while the first case is not.
30 posted on
08/11/2003 7:37:53 AM PDT by
tang-soo
To: ninenot
BTTT
32 posted on
08/11/2003 7:38:59 AM PDT by
StriperSniper
(Make South Korea an island)
To: ninenot
He was clearly unable to produce a single section of the Tax Code to that end, and the jury was unanimous in clearing Kuglin of all charges against her. If the foregoing was not so, Kuglin would have been convicted. The author assumes the lady was acquitted because she was not convicted. Wrong, there could very well be a hung jury here. The court docs on the PACER site have not been posted yet.
To: ninenot
I heard it this morning on that awful Doug Steffen (sp) radio program
45 posted on
08/11/2003 7:53:08 AM PDT by
mel
To: ninenot
Oops disregard previous post.
To: ninenot
bump
52 posted on
08/11/2003 7:57:48 AM PDT by
VOA
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-39 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson