Replies

Read your tag line. He holds no standards for moral behavior. How can he be expected to adhere to standards in other matters??

Ever heard the question about a guy, "If he has done such&such to his wife, what would he do to us?" If the man admits he doen't care about sexual morality, disavows portions of the Constitution, admits to cultural conflicts ( it is after all a very complex place he seeks to govern ), & well, there are folks with NONE of these problems. His very words are conflicted, clumsy & convey no clear intent. Why did he not present intelligent PLANS??

The Man aint got no PLAN. Brother Dyson has the story-his post #65 on
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/961407/posts?page=65#65:
Here's the real choice: a candidate who agrees with us on many issues, but has a liberal streak -- or a democrat who agrees with us on nothing and will work against us on national campaigns. You pick.

WHAT "MANY POINTS"!? The man doesn't even have a platform!

All we're getting is the idealized Schwarzenegger. The man himself has put forth no plan or platform; only platitudes and soundbites.

Sorry, but that crap just doesn't cut it in the realy world.

-Jay

65 posted on 08/10/2003 4:00 PM PDT by Jay D. Dyson (Steamroll the RINOs -- Vote for Tom McClintock! -- http://www.tommcclintock.com/)

If you people didn't exist, the Democrats would have to invent you to mislead and sucker well meaning GOP voters.

Given any election, you are willing to sell out the economy, the military and governmental efficiency and competence in favor of an impossible and radically idealist notion on gun control, abortion, as well some vague expression that historical white European cultural values should predominate. In the end, you wind up helping to place Democrat politicians in office who are your polar opposites on abortion, gun control and your social values, all while standing there slack jawed and glassy eyed, while drooling how perfectly principled you are.

Read your tag line. He holds no standards for moral behavior.

The point of the tagline is simple, it is to question why "peace activists" are always against liberal Western Democracies like America and almost never complain about crimes committed by anti-American communists and fascists. It refers to Stalinists, Maoists, Ba'athists, and Pacifists. I don't see anything in there about liberals, democrats, leftists, libertarians, or most anyone else to the right of Dick Gephardt. It is not an attack on leftism, liberalism, socialism, or permissivity.

As far as I'm concerned, liberal Democrats who didn't oppose the war are probably basically decent people, and I think we can disagree with them respectfully. As long as people can recognize that Saddam Hussein and Joe Stalin and Che Guevara were terrible criminals, and it was good that America stood up to them and their ilk, they pass the test.

Arnold passes the tagline test with flying colors.