Skip to comments.
A New Generation of Munitions
Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory ^
| July/August 2003
| Gabriele Rennie
Posted on 08/10/2003 11:49:53 AM PDT by John Jorsett
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-25 next last
I wonder how the leftist-saturated University of California, which runs LLNL, manages to assuage its conscience for helping to develop ever more powerful weapons for our military?
To: John Jorsett
Looks like bad news for the human shield business.
To: John Jorsett
Another Tom Clancy special (from, IIRC, Clear and Present Danger)
3
posted on
08/10/2003 12:12:52 PM PDT
by
balrog666
(Religions change; beer and wine remain.)
To: John Jorsett; Ernest_at_the_Beach; Ragtime Cowgirl; Grampa Dave
Because of recent military activities in Iraq and Afghanistan, some of our armament resources are depleted and have to be replenished. Now is a good time to bring in the newer technology, says Murphy.Ping to Kim Jong Il.
4
posted on
08/10/2003 12:19:42 PM PDT
by
BOBTHENAILER
(One by one, in groups or whole armies.....we don't care how we getcha, but we will)
To: BOBTHENAILER
Pinging the Opecker Thugs and Princes of the Middle East as well as short donged Kim, the Chia head.
More new weapons to kill the thug leaders and not harm innocent civilians. Thug leaders can hide and still be killed.
5
posted on
08/10/2003 12:24:17 PM PDT
by
Grampa Dave
(I think the Americans are serious. Bush is not like Clinton. I think this is the end," said Uday)
Comment #6 Removed by Moderator
To: John Jorsett
"However, the blast created by conventional steel-cased munitions can send shrapnel to distances of more than 1 kilometer from the target. This puts civilians and friendly forces at risk." Attention: lesson One of 9/11/2001: There are no civilians. There are no non-combatants.
"Collateral damage" is good.
--Boris
7
posted on
08/10/2003 12:32:53 PM PDT
by
boris
(The deadliest Weapon of Mass Destruction in History is a Leftist With a Word Processor)
To: Grampa Dave
Pinging the Opecker Thugs and Princes of the Middle East as well Nice addition to this thread; bad of me to leave them off the list.
8
posted on
08/10/2003 12:42:56 PM PDT
by
BOBTHENAILER
(One by one, in groups or whole armies.....we don't care how we getcha, but we will)
To: boris
--agreed. There obviously wasn't nearly enough "collateral" damage to Saddam supporters in the Iraqi military--
9
posted on
08/10/2003 12:47:19 PM PDT
by
rellimpank
(Stop immigration now!)
To: boris
I agree, we should make weapons that kill MORE people and break MORE things....not less.
10
posted on
08/10/2003 1:28:13 PM PDT
by
Gringo1
(Handsome...and now with springtime fresh lemon scent.)
To: balrog666
Another Tom Clancy special My first thought as well. But, Clancy's creation was encased in cellulose, rather than composites -- so that it had a lower radar cross-section.
The weight reduction has significant potential just because it can increase payload or range (because more fuel can be carried instead).
To: John Jorsett
Question: "I wonder how the leftist-saturated University of California, which runs LLNL, manages to assuage its conscience for helping to develop ever more powerful weapons for our military?"
Answer: They sell the technology to China.
12
posted on
08/10/2003 2:19:52 PM PDT
by
AEMILIUS PAULUS
(Further, the statement assumed)
To: boris
Attention: lesson One of 9/11/2001: There are no civilians. There are no non-combatants.
"Collateral damage" is good. I disagree. We're not them. Indiscriminate killing if necessary, but avoiding "collateral damage" can give us a bunch of immediate allies who have been oppressed by the monsters. Not all will appreciate it, but hunting down the holdouts is OK when the rest of the populace is on our side.
How exactly does vaporizing a bunch of peasants "pay back" for 911? The hijackers were well to do individuals.
13
posted on
08/10/2003 2:32:54 PM PDT
by
Salman
(Mickey Akbar)
To: BOBTHENAILER; John Jorsett
Thanks for the ping and the post. Loose lips sink ships means little these days with internet technology and ambitious traitors like the Clintons. The one thing tyrannical nations can never do with their military - no matter how big or powerful - is inspire them to do what ours did in both Afghanistan and Iraq - w/ our multiple forces working together toward a common goal, skilled enough to get the intel, interpret it and hit those precision targets, fly thousands of sorties without losing a pilot, fighting for freedom, a future for their family, for those who died in previous battles and the victims on the ground in NY and Iraq.
Saddam filled schools and warehouses, booby-trapped hospitals and homes in communities across Iraq. The Iraqi people not only chose not to use them against us, the many opportunities for one stray missile or flare to hit a bomb filled school and level a city block, potentially killing thousands - never happened.
We were most definitely wanted in Iraq by the vast majority of the Iraqi people.
14
posted on
08/10/2003 3:33:38 PM PDT
by
Ragtime Cowgirl
("Saddam Hussein is no longer bad news. He's a piece of trash waiting to be collected." - C. Powell)
To: Ragtime Cowgirl
Very well said.
15
posted on
08/10/2003 4:44:56 PM PDT
by
BOBTHENAILER
(One by one, in groups or whole armies.....we don't care how we getcha, but we will)
To: Eaker
Interesting ping.
To: Grampa Dave
Pinging the Opecker Thugs and Princes of the Middle East as well as short donged Kim, the Chia head. LMFAO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
17
posted on
08/10/2003 4:50:32 PM PDT
by
AAABEST
To: humblegunner
Wonder how hard it's going to be to find those pieces of
carbon fibre lodged in the brain/organs?
Ah progress.
When they get to where they can load the DNA of a specific
individual into a weapon, then they will be getting somewhere..........maybe Arrakis?
18
posted on
08/10/2003 4:54:16 PM PDT
by
tet68
To: John Jorsett
Just think - we could deliver shaped carbon munitions that look like Santa Claus for Christmas bombing! /sarcasm
19
posted on
08/10/2003 5:18:38 PM PDT
by
txzman
(Jer 23:29)
To: humblegunner
I have been working on these same lines in the garage!!!
Thanks for the ping, this might take me in a different direction!
Eaker
20
posted on
08/10/2003 5:45:05 PM PDT
by
Eaker
(This is OUR country; let's take it back!!!!!)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-25 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson