Skip to comments.
Police given 'shoot to kill' orders in new terror alert (UK)
The Sunday Telegraph (U.K.) ^
| 08/10/03
| David Bamber
Posted on 08/09/2003 5:54:45 PM PDT by Pokey78
Police have been ordered to "shoot to kill" suicide bombers following intelligence warnings that an al-Qa'eda terrorist attack in Britain may be imminent.
The Telegraph can reveal that Sir John Stevens, the Metropolitan Police Commissioner, placed his force on its highest alert last week.
|
Force alert: 'If we think we are facing a suicide bomber, we should shoot first and ask questions later'
|
He also took the unprecedented step of ordering all front-line officers to be trained in how to spot potential suicide bombers and how to respond.
The decision to issue new guidance has been prompted by intelligence passed to Britain by the FBI in a secret briefing in late July. It warned that London, along with several other foreign cities, was facing an increasing threat of a suicide bomb attack.
Britain has already been targeted by al-Qa'eda twice this year, although both plots were foiled. In January, police seized the deadly poison ricin from a flat in north London. The following month, they uncovered a plot to attack Heathrow. Troops and tanks were sent to guard the airport.
Sir John has now ordered that the hundreds of armed officers in the capital must shoot to kill if they believe that someone is trying to detonate explosives carried on their body or in a vehicle.
His instructions do not alter the law or the rules governing police use of firearms, but they make clear that if officers fear loss of life they will be justified in killing the suspect.
The Association of Chief Police Officers' rules state that armed police can use "reasonable force" to prevent injury or death. If a suspect is killed unjustifiably, however, the officer could still face trial for murder or manslaughter.
One senior officer said: "He's made it plain that if we think we are facing a suicide bomber, we should shoot first and ask questions later."
Sir John has also told his officers that information from British intelligence indicates there are more al-Qa'eda agents in Britain than previously thought. He believes that the terror network is sufficiently extensive to be able to mount suicide attacks.
Senior Metropolitan Police officers were briefed on the increasing threat at a presentation held at Scotland Yard's firearms unit last week. Extra guidance on countering suicide bombers is now being given to officers in London, and will be extended to other forces next month.
The training and guidance is being organised by specialist officers who have visited Sri Lanka and Israel, which have long experience of suicide bombings. The new guidance will be included in a counter-terrorist manual, compiled by Chief Insp Andy Latto, Scotland Yard's senior firearms instructor.
"Suicide bombers are getting better at killing people," he said. "The increase in deaths is far superior to the increase in incidents. We are currently briefing chief officers across the country and the information will cascade down to officers."
Although much of the content of the manual is confidential, it will examine the various methods of suicide attackers, who often pack their devices with either nails or ballbearings to cause maximum wounding.
It is understood to detail the cases of the two British suicide bombers who struck in Tel Aviv in April - as a warning that Britons have been trained in such attacks.
One of the pair was killed, along with three other people, when his bomb exploded. The other fled when his failed to detonate. He was later found dead in the sea.
The Met is so concerned about the dangers posed by al-Qa'eda that officers are to stage a mock attack on a London Underground station next month to test police ability to prevent, react to and deal with the aftermath of a terrorist incident.
TOPICS: Breaking News; Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events; United Kingdom; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: 200301; 200302; attack; banglist; bomber; britain; heathrowplot; imminent; ricinplots; terror; terrorist; threats; uk
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-29 next last
1
posted on
08/09/2003 5:54:45 PM PDT
by
Pokey78
To: Pokey78
They must have some very reliable intelligence.
I wonder if there is an imminent strike warning in the US. I would guess it's very likely.
To: Pokey78
The obvious first step is to invade all the mosques in the US and UK and clean out the *piles* of God knows what that's in there.
3
posted on
08/09/2003 6:03:29 PM PDT
by
Monty22
To: FairOpinion
I tend to agree.
4
posted on
08/09/2003 6:05:40 PM PDT
by
Brad’s Gramma
(fREE rEPUBLIC iS nOT aDDICTIVE, fREE rEPUBLIC iS nOT aDDICTIVE, fREE rEPUBLIC iS nOT aDDICTIVE, fREE)
To: Pokey78
He also took the unprecedented step of ordering all front-line officers to be trained in how to spot potential suicide bombers and how to respond. Shoot exploding Muslims on sight!
5
posted on
08/09/2003 6:30:40 PM PDT
by
Djarum
To: Brad's Gramma
I agree also. I'm afraid the Western World is in for a very tough time of it,especially the U.S. and the U.K.
We could have years of bombings in malls.restaurants,supermarkets etc. These are places with little or no security and it would certainly affect the American way of life.
We make not ever have anything as dramatic as 9-11 but bombing in assorted places would be as disruptive.
6
posted on
08/09/2003 6:41:28 PM PDT
by
Mears
To: Fusion
your comments?
7
posted on
08/09/2003 6:43:29 PM PDT
by
MarMema
To: Pokey78
The only time they can't shoot is if the terrorista are
burglarizing someones home.
8
posted on
08/09/2003 6:45:08 PM PDT
by
tet68
To: FairOpinion
The order in the UK is shoot first ask questions later. The U.S. plays with crayons first...then thinks about it...then tell us something....then a bomb goes off in some foreign country.
Worthless Crayola Terror Chart
9
posted on
08/09/2003 6:52:16 PM PDT
by
My Favorite Headache
(Which one will lose? Depends on what I choose or maybe which voice...I ignore.)
To: Mears
10
posted on
08/09/2003 6:57:15 PM PDT
by
My Favorite Headache
(Which one will lose? Depends on what I choose or maybe which voice...I ignore.)
To: Pokey78
Islam Is Peace
11
posted on
08/09/2003 7:02:59 PM PDT
by
My Favorite Headache
(Which one will lose? Depends on what I choose or maybe which voice...I ignore.)
To: Mears
>>We could have years of bombings in malls, restaurants,supermarkets etc. These are places with little or no security and it would certainly affect the American way of life.
There is and would be substantially more security in those parts of Red Zone America with shall-issue concealed carry laws.
12
posted on
08/09/2003 7:21:56 PM PDT
by
FreedomPoster
(this space intentionally blank)
To: Pokey78
Yeah right this is England
I feel sorry for any cop who does shoot
one of their precious wogs
he will be crucified
13
posted on
08/09/2003 7:34:00 PM PDT
by
joesnuffy
(Moderate Islam Is For Dilettantes)
To: Pokey78
Tony Blair vs. Captain Hook
14
posted on
08/09/2003 7:40:29 PM PDT
by
Alouette
(Every democratic politician should live next door to a pimp, so he can have someone to look up to.)
To: Pokey78
"We come in peace, Shoot to kill, Shoot to kill, Shoot to kill, Shoot to kill, We come in peace, Shoot to kill, Shoot to kill, Shoot to kill, men!"
15
posted on
08/09/2003 7:41:47 PM PDT
by
mhking
To: *bang_list
Useless rhetoric. They don't have enough armed police officers and the restictions alone will stop any officer from firing.
16
posted on
08/09/2003 7:44:02 PM PDT
by
Shooter 2.5
(Don't punch holes in the lifeboat.)
To: Pokey78
You mean they are actually going to allow the UK police to carry guns.........*gasp*
17
posted on
08/09/2003 7:54:23 PM PDT
by
Husker24
To: tet68
Yep....
The individual has no right to defend his own family or property
only the state has that right
and they only defend the families of the elite and their property (and the ones they have liens on)
18
posted on
08/09/2003 8:06:11 PM PDT
by
joesnuffy
(Moderate Islam Is For Dilettantes)
To: Pokey78
The bloody Bobbies should call upon the services of Mr. Martin.
19
posted on
08/10/2003 3:17:22 AM PDT
by
Rudder
To: Shooter 2.5
You're right if my observations a couple years ago are still correct. I was looking to see how many police officers were armed. I saw very few. Maybe things have changed since then but I doubt it.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-29 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson