Replies

nless and until you give some coherent explanation of the significance of your silly question, why would anyone discuss it further with you. GW and I have both answered your question and I at least don't need you interpreting my answer or his when you cannot even explain your incoherent line. We both said we were anti-slavery. He said Scripture did not require the manumission of slaves. His answer and my answer and the truth as to Scripture which he posted are not inconsistent. No one in our country owns slaves. No slave exists in our country legally bound to a master. No slave has been legally purchased here or legally born into slavery here who is still alive. If the Barney Fife's have pastors and/or lawyers, you might want to go and find out what you are talking about. Even they are probably more coherent than you.