Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: liberallarry
"The point I was trying to make is the point I have been making all along - we intend to change the entire Muslim world and Iraq is only a small part of the strategy."

I can't quite follow, so I'm asking.. And please don't play games, just answer honestly if you reply...

Are you for this? Are you for changing the islamic world? I sure am, but I'm not sure of your positions at all.
99 posted on 08/09/2003 4:43:32 PM PDT by Monty22
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies ]


To: Monty22
Are you for this?

Yes.

Are you for changing the islamic world?

Yes.

I sure am, but I'm not sure of your positions at all

That's discouraging as hell to hear since I said it as clearly as I could in many posts on this thread. I wonder what I'm doing wrong?

I believe that the Administration at the very least exagerated the immediate dangers of Iraq's WMDs in order to sell their policy of military intervention. I support both the policy and the exagerations used to sell it.

I've had arguments several times over the last few months about the latter. My opponents felt that exagerations (lies?) would return to haunt the administration. I felt that was unlikely because the we had real reasons to fear Iraq's policies and actions, and because Al Queda would likely perpetrate another outrage which would make everyone forget about exagerations. It appears my opponents were right.

100 posted on 08/09/2003 4:58:17 PM PDT by liberallarry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 99 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson