Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: liberallarry
a thoroughly dishonest ignoramus

Dishonest?

Let's try again. You said:

    But I also believe - and support - the idea that the Administration exagerated the immediate dangers because its real reasons could not honestly be sold to the American public

Now, WHO was being dishonest? Note, I did not accuse Bush of lying.

Don't bother answering, anyone who so desires can endeavor to find out.

93 posted on 08/09/2003 2:31:59 PM PDT by TomB
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies ]


To: TomB
Don't bother answering, anyone who so desires can endeavor to find out.

I said it in Post #9, and again in #90, and many times in between. Since you can read I think you're terminally dishonest.

96 posted on 08/09/2003 4:19:00 PM PDT by liberallarry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 93 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson