Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Burkeman1
Bush said that Saddam had WMD's, Saddam said that he didn't.

Your contention is that Saddam told the truth and Bush lied.

Of course, we are not going to discuss the fact that Saddam's possesion of WMD's is a well-known, highly documented fact (which includes photographic evidence of his having used biological and chemical weapons on his own people), and that the entire reason for us going in was that Saddam had, since the end of Desert Storm, failed to provide the United Nations with proof of their destruction.

Just so we understand each other here...do you also believe that Al Gore was elected but Bush stole the elections?
86 posted on 08/09/2003 12:36:39 AM PDT by Luis Gonzalez (I am he as you are he as you are me and we are all together.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]


To: Luis Gonzalez
I have never card if Sadaam had ICBMS that could pin point the building in which I Live in Boston. The point is he was never a thrat. In fact he is more of a threat now.
89 posted on 08/09/2003 12:48:43 AM PDT by Burkeman1 ((If you see ten troubles comin down the road, Nine will run into the ditch before they reach you.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson