You're doing "
it " again. Stop it, calm down, take more than a few deep breaths, and read more carefully.
You are NOT ever going to get the truth /facts from LEFTY papers or magazines, or web sites. That's just for starters.
You're utterly clueless, as to the whys and wherefores, as stated by President Bush, why we went to Iraq. Besides the stated claims, this is 1) a continuation on the war on terror 2) a not too subtle message to the whole of the middle east AND others, that unlike Clinton, we are NOT going to turn a blind eye, nor buy them off. Both have worked splendidly. And YES, we'll be shown the WMDs ( some have already come out, but you refuse to acknowledge this fact )... when it's going to do the most good.
Unlike WW I, WW II, Korea ( which was as botched as Vietnem !), Nam, and what we have done/are still doing, ARE legitimate instances for American involvment.
And YES, we'll be shown the WMDs ( some have already come out, but you refuse to acknowledge this fact )... when it's going to do the most good.
Mostly np, I think your nuts (in a good way usually)... but dang it... you certainly NAILED IT THERE... I like how you think.
I expect that about the time doctor idiot for the demos starts ranting his arse off about him having proof there were absolutely NOT any wmds... then reports will be declassified or "leaked", a few samples released... and the dems new king of the pile will be forced to eat raw crow.
Of course, you notice some of them demns seem to instinctively KNOW this is coming just in time for the election and hence are keeping their big yaps shut? They know whassup.
Bush is truely gifted at offering folks plenty of juicy feet for their gaping mouths, that are so wide open, they cannot possibly refuse a mouthful or two, of their own feet.
WMD's... I would bet on it.
like you said