I'm not willing to reject Arnold yet. This position statement could also be pol-speak in a leftist state. Exactly what does it matter if he happens to be pro-abortion--particularly when we don't know just how pro he is. Abortion is a national issue, and a governor does not have much to say about it, particularly with a DNC state congress. Also, homosexual adoption is already a reality, and we might ask, "Which couple, and which kid?" The sensible gun control might also be a salve for liberals--I have no idea what that means.
If he had come out pro-life, anti-homosexual adoption, and pro-gun...would that have done us much good, or just made it more likely that he'd lose? A CA guv's real issues are in dealing with illegal immigration, getting the spending under control...not the hot-button social issues over which he'd have little control, anyway.
I'd like to know *Rush's* stand on illegal immigration, BTW. Anyone know? Los Angeles County has spent 350M dollars on illegal immigrants' emergency health care in one year. This staggers the mind...
I don't recall hearing any essays from Rush on the flood of illegals--you don't, generally, from the richer end of the GOP. They like the cheap servants.