1 posted on
08/08/2003 4:51:55 AM PDT by
kattracks
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21 last
To: kattracks
Hopefully someone can answer a question I have regarding the gay Bishop. I assume he was a priest in charge of a congregation up to this point in time. I also assume that it was well known that he was gay - after all he left his wife and children to live with another man. I quite frankly do not understand why his "gayness" was not a problem when he was a priest, but becomes a problem now that he is a Bishop. I take it that openly active gay priests are acceptable in the Episcopalian church. If so, it is corrupt at its very core, and the uproar over the Bishop is a non-event.
176 posted on
08/09/2003 10:47:29 PM PDT by
mosby
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21 last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson