Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: archy
Well, we can hope that those who still believe that an infantryman should be able to engage targets at 500-1000 yards with his rifle (artillery and air support do that, along with the .50s) will not be given as much influence as they have in the past.

I like accurate rifles; I just think that having one capable of 1000 yard accuracy is a little much for the average troop. Not every driver needs a 'Vette, either.

511 posted on 02/14/2004 12:52:57 PM PST by Long Cut (It's Great To Be Home In America, Finally.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 508 | View Replies ]


To: Long Cut; Criminal Number 18F
Well, we can hope that those who still believe that an infantryman should be able to engage targets at 500-1000 yards with his rifle (artillery and air support do that, along with the .50s) will not be given as much influence as they have in the past.

Maybe, though if the CAS and now-downsizing artillery aren't around, I do want them to have an answer for hostile fire from an SVD or PK. Or one of our own XM107s, M24s or M25s being used against us.

I like accurate rifles; I just think that having one capable of 1000 yard accuracy is a little much for the average troop. Not every driver needs a 'Vette, either.

Average troop, yes, top troop per platoon is something else, or top six per company is something else again. Every driver likely doesn't need either a 'Vette or a Bradley, but a well-qualified driver should be able to turn in a good performance in either.

518 posted on 02/14/2004 2:14:45 PM PST by archy (I was told we'd cruise the seas for American gold. We'd fire no guns-shed no tears....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 511 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson