To: Long Cut; bang_list; kallisti
No one has addressed the 'kinetic energy' technology mention in the article. If that's what I think it is (some type of post detonation acceleration of the bullet) all of the discussions about .223 being an inadequate round go out of the window.
Can someone expound on this for me?
To: ericthecurdog
"some type of post detonation acceleration of the bullet"
This feature in a bullet would violate the Geneva Convention.
To: ericthecurdog
"some type of post detonation acceleration of the bullet"
This feature in a bullet would violate the Geneva Convention.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson