Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Travis McGee
Agree totally. Overall, I think attempting to get ONE weapon to do the jobs of about four is a lost cause. Besides, it makes sense on a number of levels to have a "mix" of weapons in a unit. Heck, it worked well enough in WWII, what with squads and platoons carrying M-1s, carbines, Thompsons/M-3s, BAR's, and Browning MGs all in one outfit.
440 posted on 11/30/2003 8:56:07 AM PST by Long Cut (Whiskey...oil for life's frictions)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 439 | View Replies ]


To: Long Cut
I agree with that! It worked well enough on Iwo Jima!

And I still think that a platoon of elite troops armed with Ruger Mini-14s, or M1 Carbines for that matter, will utterly destroy a platoon of unmotivated conscripts armed with XM-8s. And after that encounter, they'll have the better weapons if they want them.

Even so, I'm all for issuing the XM-8 for all of the listed reasons.

But really, considering the type of mounted and dismounted warfare we're involved in, and the need to penetrate mud and cinder block walls etc, I think it's time to dump the 5.56 altogether. The old rationales for 5.56mm no longer apply, and the caliber is now deficient, no matter how nice the bullet launcher employed.

441 posted on 11/30/2003 9:02:27 AM PST by Travis McGee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 440 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson