Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

U.S. June wholesale inventories unchanged
Biz.Yahoo/Reuters ^ | August 7, 2003

Posted on 08/07/2003 7:10:35 AM PDT by Starwind

U.S. June wholesale inventories unchanged
Thursday August 7, 10:03 am ET

 WASHINGTON, Aug 7 (Reuters) - U.S Commerce Department report
of wholesale inventories and sales, seasonally adjusted.
(Percent Changes)        June    May  (Prev) June03/02
Inventories Total        unch   -0.4   -0.3      1.8
  Durable Goods          unch   -0.5   -0.3      1.7
Automotive                1.9   -0.8   -0.8      9.2
Prof'l equip              0.1    1.5    1.5      0.1
Computer equip.           0.1    2.6    2.5     -5.5
Machinery                -0.6   -0.4   -0.3     -2.4
  Nondurable Goods        0.1   -0.3   -0.1      1.9
Petroleum                 1.9    3.6    3.7      1.0
.                        June    May  (Prev) June03/02
Sales Total               1.5   -0.2   -0.5      3.9
  Durable Goods           1.1   -0.1   -0.4      0.6
Automotive                2.2    0.2   -0.1      3.8
Prof'l equip              0.1   -1.8   -1.7     -1.9
Computer equip.           0.2   -3.6   -3.5     -7.7
Machinery                 1.4    1.4    1.1      1.4
  Nondurable Goods        1.8   -0.4   -0.7      7.1
Petroleum                 7.3   -1.8   -3.7     20.1
(Billions of dlrs)       June      May    (Prev)  June'02
Inventories Total      289.05   288.96   289.34   283.92
  Durable Goods        174.10   174.17   174.40   171.12
Automotive              25.82    25.34    25.33    23.64
  Nondurables          114.95   114.79   114.94   112.80
(Billions of dlrs)       June      May    (Prev)  June'02
Sales Total            237.52   234.05   233.43   228.58
  Durable Goods        113.04   111.79   111.53   112.31
Automotive              18.27    17.88    17.82    17.59
  Nondurables          124.49   122.26   121.90   116.26
Stock-to_sales ratio     June      May    (Prev)  June'02
.                        1.22     1.23     1.24     1.24
 FORECAST:
 Reuters survey of U.S. economists forecast:
 U.S. June wholesale inventories unchanged
 HISTORICAL COMPARISONS/NOTES:
 US JUNE WHOLESALE SALES RISE LARGEST SINCE APR'02 (+1.6 PCT)
 US JUNE APPAREL STOCK/SALES RATIO 1.81 MONTHS, HIGHEST SINCE
SEPT'01 (1.84)
 The stock-to-sales ratio is a measure of how long it would
take to deplete inventories at the current sales pace.


TOPICS: Business/Economy
KEYWORDS: inventories; wholesale; wholesaletrade
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-52 next last
The full Commerce Dept report (.pdf) is at MONTHLY WHOLESALE TRADE: SALES AND INVENTORIES - JUNE 2003
1 posted on 08/07/2003 7:10:43 AM PDT by Starwind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: AdamSelene235; AntiGuv; arete; Black Agnes; Cicero; David; Fractal Trader; gabby hayes; imawit; ...
Fyi...
2 posted on 08/07/2003 7:11:07 AM PDT by Starwind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Starwind
Briefing.com comments:

10:09 ET Economic Review - wholesale inventories : June wholesale inventories were unchanged as the large 1.5% jump in sales stripped warehouse supply. The combination left a 1.22 month inventory to sales ratio -- just above the 1.21 record low of March. Low inventory supply will provide a boost to production as inventory rebuilding will strengthen under a stronger growth economy to provide a welcome tailwind.

3 posted on 08/07/2003 7:27:29 AM PDT by Texas_Dawg ("...They came to hate their party and this president... They have finished by hating their country.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Texas_Dawg
Low inventory supply will provide a boost to production

I'm sure it will...much of it China and Mexico's production.

4 posted on 08/07/2003 7:33:41 AM PDT by Starwind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Starwind
I'm sure it will...much of it China and Mexico's production.

Hey, whatever makes more profits and cheaper goods for Americans is fine with me. If someone's worried about it costing them their job, maybe they should work for less and quit crying to the federal government.

5 posted on 08/07/2003 7:46:56 AM PDT by Texas_Dawg ("...They came to hate their party and this president... They have finished by hating their country.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Texas_Dawg
Amen, bro. This constant whining is getting old. You create your own job and you make your own value, no matter who you work for. Every day, YOU are responsible for your job.
6 posted on 08/07/2003 7:52:12 AM PDT by LS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Texas_Dawg
"If someone's worried about it costing them their job, maybe they should work for less..."

And maybe you should take a running jump...

7 posted on 08/07/2003 7:53:08 AM PDT by The Green Goblin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Texas_Dawg
Hey, whatever makes more profits and cheaper goods for Americans is fine with me. If someone's worried about it costing them their job, maybe they should work for less and quit crying to the federal government.

So, if your focus is cost & profit, why do you think boosting China or Mexico's production to replenish US inventories is good? The profits are theirs and the 'goods' are only as cheap as the cheapest American producer (note for example that Maytag moves 3 appliance manufacturing operations to Mexico, but did not argue consumers will get a price break).

Prices are set as high as the market will bear - the cost savings in China and Mexico is not passed onto american consumers, but is retained by the Chinese/Mexican manufactures, the importers, retailers, and/or the American parents of same.

Just setting the jobs issue aside, why is boosting foreign production good?

8 posted on 08/07/2003 8:05:27 AM PDT by Starwind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: LS
Amen, bro. This constant whining is getting old. You create your own job and you make your own value, no matter who you work for. Every day, YOU are responsible for your job.
Except that there are so many government regulations here, and so many high fees, high taxes and mandates on employers that it's getting very difficult to make your own job.

That's a big part of the job loss problem. We've made the USA such a business hostile climate that nobody wants to build factories (or labs or engineering facilities) here anymore. It's not the wages for American workers that are killing American jobs, it's the endless regulations and high taxes. Also, the fact that the long term trend for interest rates is upward to high levels (private business has to compete with government borrowing, which shows no signs that it will ever decrease now), and the long term trend for taxes is upward too (to fund prescriptions for Medicar, Medicare and Social Security for Baby Boomers, and an ever expanding welfare state promoted by Socialist 'Republicans' in an attempt to beat the opposition by becoming the opposition).

The other half of the picture is that it's not illegal to buy products made by dumping tons of sulfur compounds into the air and tons of industrial waste into rivers. It's not illegal to buy products made by 12 year old children working 14 hour days, 7 days a week, for pennies a day either. You can buy those products at your local Walmart any day, and they are extremely cheap, too.

It is illegal to hire American 12 year olds for that price and work them that way. It's illegal to spew that pollution into America's skys and rivers.

There is something seriously wrong with this situation, too.

9 posted on 08/07/2003 8:07:09 AM PDT by cc2k
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: LS
You create your own job and you make your own value, no matter who you work for

..and who is going to make up the shortfall in taxes to pay out the welfare benefits when more jobs leave?

The 90% income tax for "people who make their own jobs" is coming unless the trend is reversed. Maybe the constant whining isn't without merit. Where there is value, there is a tax man. Until the system is corrected, that is what people must live under.

10 posted on 08/07/2003 9:07:26 AM PDT by superloser
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: The Green Goblin
And maybe you should take a running jump...

Yeah... God forbid someone take personal responsibility for having a job or not.

11 posted on 08/07/2003 9:15:15 AM PDT by Texas_Dawg ("...They came to hate their party and this president... They have finished by hating their country.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: cc2k
Except that there are so many government regulations here, and so many high fees, high taxes and mandates on employers that it's getting very difficult to make your own job.

So you argue for even more of them? That's crazy.

12 posted on 08/07/2003 9:15:54 AM PDT by Texas_Dawg ("...They came to hate their party and this president... They have finished by hating their country.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Texas_Dawg
Yeah... God forbid someone take personal responsibility for having a job or not.

I wasn't criticizing you for that; I was criticizing you for your cavalier statement that "maybe people should work for less." Can you live on $6000 a year?

13 posted on 08/07/2003 9:20:28 AM PDT by The Green Goblin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: The Green Goblin
Can you live on $6000 a year?

I could. I don't want to though. That's why I have a job. If I didn't have a job, I would get one. Please let me know the day you hear me asking the federal government to take money from every other American to insure that I have a job.

14 posted on 08/07/2003 9:23:42 AM PDT by Texas_Dawg ("...They came to hate their party and this president... They have finished by hating their country.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: superloser
Hey, any anti-tax movement/legislation you can get, I'm with ya. I lecture my students on this all the time. They all learn the Laffer Curve. But even then, you make your own value.
15 posted on 08/07/2003 9:25:28 AM PDT by LS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: cc2k
You are 100% right on regulations and taxes. Who really can question your position except a DU regular?

There is no question that our system needs a major overhaul---but I think Bush and the GOP have made a good start. The things that got cut from the budget and tax bills would be beneficial, and there are something we could get if we have a larger majority in the Senate.

16 posted on 08/07/2003 9:27:41 AM PDT by LS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Starwind
Hey, whatever makes more profits and cheaper goods for Americans is fine with me. If someone's worried about it costing them their job, maybe they should work for less and quit crying to the federal government.

When the Chinese yuan is eventually floated (as it must), the dollar will collapse along with Wallymart.


BUMP

17 posted on 08/07/2003 9:29:00 AM PDT by tm22721 (May the UN rest in peace)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: LS
What do you teach?
18 posted on 08/07/2003 9:30:53 AM PDT by Dead Dog (There are no minority rights in a democracy. 51% get's 49%'s stuff.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: tm22721
What will happen to T-bills when the dollar collapses?
19 posted on 08/07/2003 9:31:47 AM PDT by Dead Dog (There are no minority rights in a democracy. 51% get's 49%'s stuff.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Texas_Dawg
Except that there are so many government regulations here, and so many high fees, high taxes and mandates on employers that it's getting very difficult to make your own job.
So you argue for even more of them? That's crazy.
No, I argue that we should:
  1. Reduce the regulatory burdens on American businesses and American workers to some extent.
  2. Shift some of the regulatory burden onto importers of foreign made goods, and onto foreign producers. Mostly to level the playing field.
Both actions are necessary for long term fair trade to work well in the long run.
20 posted on 08/07/2003 9:44:51 AM PDT by cc2k
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-52 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson