My ability to read and process information is fine. It's my refusal to accept your line of reasoning you should wonder about. I have no intention of conceding anything.
I do find it interesting that in interviews with both Scalia and Thomas, both made the point that SCOTUS can rule whatever it wants, but it's up to the American people to accept or reject it.
You don't have to respect my view, but you do have to live with it.
What am I reasoning? I'm not reasoning anything--I'm just quoting from the Constitution.
Do you dispute the text? Do you think it means something other than what it says?
Do you think when it says "the Judges in every State shall be bound thereby" actually means "the Judges in every State shall be bound thereby, except when they really don't feel like following the Constituion?"
Seriously, what is the point of having a Constitution if the members of the government aren't bound by it? Why have it at all if the judges are free to disregard it willy-nilly?