Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: HapaxLegamenon
* With the exception of course to the 2nd admendment which is a part of the bill of rights, but gives no rights, and the 9th admendment which gives the peolple the right, unless the courts of course say no, and the 10th admendments which gives states the right to make their own laws, subject of course to the Veto power of Ruth Gader Ginsburgh et al.

Supreme Coup't

79 posted on 08/08/2003 7:33:56 AM PDT by Woahhs
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies ]


To: Woahhs
It's really simple. Since the Warren court of the '50's there has been an ever-increasing crescendo of usurpations of power by the Federal judiciary. This is simply the latest. We all know that the Establishment clause referred to a state setting up an established church, nothing more. Every other interpretation is simple a few nabobs deciding what the rest of us peasants should be forced to do. I hope this case goes to the wall. I believe in the Constitution as it was originally written, not the mish-mash of liberal tyranny that has been imposed on it.
80 posted on 08/08/2003 7:49:52 AM PDT by ZeitgeistSurfer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson