Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Dr Warmoose
Missing from your analysis is the number of domestic jobs lost because Sprint can now charge more for its product or service domestically. You intend to keep the price of labor at a artificial level. Sprint will pass that cost along to you.
329 posted on 08/07/2003 6:20:00 PM PDT by 1rudeboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 321 | View Replies ]


To: 1rudeboy
You intend to keep the price of labor at a artificial level. Sprint will pass that cost along to you.

Looks like someone slept through Business 101. Sprint, if it wants to stay competitive will not raise its rates, it just won't show so much profit. If Sprint can't compete then they disappear - and the business will be picked up by the more efficient and attractive (who will in turn increase their staff and purchase more equipment) meanwhile, the reasons why Sprint couldn't compete would be lost. Economic Darwinism, you say its OK to kill off American workers, it shouldn't be a problem if it kills off inefficient businesses, right?

333 posted on 08/07/2003 6:30:57 PM PDT by Dr Warmoose
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 329 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson