Neither does my drinking of beer. Or skiing. Or having two cats, who don't do anything around the house except barf up hairballs from time to time.
And while we're at it, I don't need an SUV - having that big vehicle serves no useful purpose, I should have a compact car - or better yet, take mass transit. We should not just determine if something is useful, but we should make sure that people are doing things the best way possible. Set up a government agency to do just that. Call it the Bureau of Usefulness, and get John Cleese to play the director.
There are many good arguments against homosexuality (it goes beyond lack of usefulness to being a major public health problem, for example), but I am leary of those who demand that an activity serve a useful purpose to be allowed. They're usually overweening busybodies who want to pry their way into every aspect of your life, with the government as their crowbar.
Actually those words aptly describe the homo-nazis and their lawyers who are very very busy "rammin and crammin" their sick agenda down our throats via legislated laws and the courts. Conservatives are merely trying to protect ourselves from their crowbars.
Actually those words aptly describe the homo-nazis and their lawyers who are very very busy "rammin and crammin" their sick agenda down our throats via legislated laws and the courts. Conservatives are merely trying to protect ourselves from their crowbars.
Actually those words aptly describe the homo-nazis and their lawyers who are very very busy "rammin and crammin" their sick agenda down our throats via legislated laws and the courts. Conservatives are merely trying to protect ourselves from their crowbars.