To: breakem
It should be presented as such, not as being factual.
7 posted on
08/06/2003 10:35:27 AM PDT by
dirtboy
("How do you work this thing?" - question from Hillary supporter at a book signing...)
To: dirtboy
I wouldn't lose any sleep over it. Thge point of good satire is that readers understand it is satire. If you know the paper and its writers and then read the ad, it seems obvious.
13 posted on
08/06/2003 10:37:02 AM PDT by
breakem
To: dirtboy
Sorry for the omit. This is what the Gannett family (USA Today) of papers do. They omit things important to the issue purely to advance their political objective.
Thx and sorry for the confusion.
To: dirtboy
While I don't disagree with you, I find it intriguing that you went to the trouble of going to another website and searching for the job listing, but you didn't go to the trouble of reading the article.
18 posted on
08/06/2003 10:40:38 AM PDT by
krb
(the statement on the other side of this tagline is false)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson