Well, me neither. I'm an historian, and I was nowhere near NYC on 9/11. That said, the documentaries and reports produced post-9/11 were quite clear on the fate of those in the high floors of the towers, and why they were doomed.
I DO have a friend with a master's in engineering, and he explained it basically like the article. The terrible heat/fire from a full load of jet-fuel basically melted the steel girders.
Yes and no. The jet fuel for the most part actually burned off fairly quickly. The problem is, all that burning jet fuel ignited all the office furniture, carpets, papers, etc on the floors. That fire is largely what weakened the girders, which had whatever fireproofing they did have blasted off by the impact itself (and subsequent flying debris).
Using asbestos wouldn't have made any significant difference in whether the buildings collapsed or not, since it would've been blasted off the important girders - the lateral ones that supported the floors - anyway.
It might be fun to argue over and grumble about some of the stupid things that the environmentalist movement has done over the years, but it's wrong to unjustly (or ignorantly) push tragedies off on them.
Snidely