I hope you are wrong. As you know, there is nothing wrong with your reasoning. There must be something to this purported physical evidence, or they wouldn't be leaking what they are. But, I won't believe it until I see it. This is the DA leaking, afterall.
The facts that are known are what has me leaning toward Kobe. The DA does not necessarily have a good case, just because he brought it. He thought about it long and hard before deciding. If this was a 'slam dunk', he would have acted faster.
Rapists are known to "engage" in that type of "rough sex"...
I think the evidence in this case may be along those lines...
Well, it must have been a difficult decision. Hopefully he knew about the accuser's weak past, and that should cause anyone without a videotape of the alleged crime pause. Here's the thing: if he had gone forward quickly, he might have regrets now that he was taking an unwinnable case to court. But since he thought it out and still chose to go forward, methinks he really felt after sleeping on it that Kobe could be proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt.
This story is not a "leak". It is an official release of information contained in court documents.
In the case of other news media reports, it is not clear who is leaking what. Remember the Starr investigation? The media report would make it sound like Starr was leaking grand jury testimony, only later it turned out that a lot of it was actually coming from the W.H., in order to discredit Starr by making him look like the leaker. Remember that Bryant's defense team has access to all the same information the prosecutor has; the leaks could be coming from them. The judge has just appointed a special investigator to look into the matter, so hopefully that will clear things up.
But regardless of who is leaking, that doesn't change the truth or falsity of the information being leaked. We will not be able to judge that until we see what is admitted at the trial.