[Always Right]

Clearly the collective feelings of the court is much more important than the actual constitution or law.

[PJ-Comix]

What the NJ Supreme Court feels about reading their constitution is EXACTLY what the liberals think about the U.S. Constitution. When they say the U.S. Constititution is a "living document" they mean they can interpret it any way they want. People who believe that the constitution should be interpreted just the way it is written are called "strict contructionists" who are unwilling to read into it interpretations that just don't exist as it is written. Anyway, the NJ Supreme Court let the cat out of the bag with their recent statement. And remember, all liberals have the SAME thought about the U.S. Constitution. It MUST NOT be read as it is written.

[tbpiper]

The constitution doesn't mean what it says. It means what it means at the time it says what it means to those who are intersted at that time in what it means to say. It takes someone of clearly superior intellect and moral fiber to creat the precise temporal relative meaning of the consitution. That is why it is so important to put in those places of authority people who are much above the common citizenry in these vital areas so that the determination of constitutional truth is absolutely relative to the superior emotions of the court....I hope I've cleared that up for you.

[an amused spectator]

Clearly the collective feelings of the court is much more important than the actual constitution or law.

Can't you see how much the New Jersey Supreme Court believes in its causes? How can you deny the validity of their emotions by failing to agree with them? ;-)