To: SkyPilot
Sure they did. A whole 14 minute "investigation." Did you even read the article?
11 posted on
08/06/2003 4:19:18 AM PDT by
tdadams
To: tdadams
I heard on Imus this morning that there was no investigation.
12 posted on
08/06/2003 4:31:36 AM PDT by
nygoose
To: tdadams
Did you read the comments? Remember Anita Hill? This matter was disposed of with remarkable swiftness. Now, it does appear that the allegations were way overblown, and they smack of character asassination. But in the case of a conservative, anti-abortion judicial nominee, similarly weak accusations triggered weeks of prying into every corner of an honorable man's private life. No such phenomenon here.
"Beware. This is the way they play." My backside. This is a classic feminist/homosexual activist maneuver. How do you like it now? Care to go back to the old, striaghtforward way of doing things? Even if it means that people can refuse to have homosexual leaders,if that's how they want it? If not, prepare to see more of this kind of dirty fighting.
15 posted on
08/06/2003 4:44:09 AM PDT by
Glock22
To: tdadams
Did you even read the article? There was no "article" tdadams. There was an "editorial" from the Minneapolis Red Star. Do you understand the difference?
18 posted on
08/06/2003 5:05:14 AM PDT by
SkyPilot
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson