[Kevin Curry]

This is an interesting new doctrine. That which Jesus didn't explicitly prohibit is permissible.

It's a sort of post-modern "red letter" phrarasaism. If it isn't found expressly forbidden in the red-letter verses of the New Testament, it's fully allowable. This interesting twist on the pharasaical model of extreme legalism is employed with great zeal to justify and excuse licentious behavior.

But common sense and the Holy Ghost witness against this outrageous, cynical, and self-serving cancer on the body of the church soul.

Meanwhile it appears Bishop "Vicki" Robinson yesterday likened his winning a forced acceptance of sexual perversion on the flock to the glorious resurrection of Jesus Christ. Astounding.

[Rightwing Conspiratr1]

It's a sort of post-modern "red letter" phrarasaism. If it isn't found expressly forbidden in the red-letter verses of the New Testament, it's fully allowable. This interesting twist on the pharasaical model of extreme legalism is employed with great zeal to justify and excuse licentious behavior.

And if it is prohibited, they can just invoke the "Who are you to judge?"

Eventually they'll get right down to the Satanic basics, "Do what thou wilt shall be the whole of the Law"

[Dataman]

In only 30 years we have gone from classifying homosexuality as a mental illness to putting them in charge of children. What of the next 30 years?