Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

CAMERON'S TOPLESS WIN (Update)
SkyNews ^ | 08/05/03 | Staff Writer

Posted on 08/05/2003 6:57:49 AM PDT by bedolido

Hollywood actress Cameron Diaz has temporarily blocked the publication of topless photographs taken before she was famous.

The 31-year-old star of Charlie's Angles and Something About Mary is suing photographer John Rutter in a Los Angeles court to suppress the pictures, taken when she was 21.

She says a signature appearing on a release form permitting sale of the photos, has been forged.

Los Angeles Superior Court Judge Alan Haber ruled that the pictures should be sealed until the case is settled because Diaz has a right to protect the privacy of her own body.

He also sealed release of a videotape the contents of which would not be revealed by either side.

Diaz's success has skyrocketed in recent years with films such as Something About Mary, My Best Friend's Wedding and Gangs of New York making her one of the best-paid female stars in Hollywood.

She has recently hit the headlines over a reported romantic dalliance with former Britney Spears beau and boy band pin-up Justin Timberlake.

Last Updated: 11:11 UK, Tuesday August 05, 200


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Miscellaneous; News/Current Events; United Kingdom
KEYWORDS: camerons; topless; win

1 posted on 08/05/2003 6:57:49 AM PDT by bedolido
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: bedolido
VH1 had Diaz and a host of other female celebs topless and nekkid all over the place on a "Naked Celebrities" special last night. Beware the telephoto lens.
2 posted on 08/05/2003 6:59:13 AM PDT by Wolfie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bedolido
"sealed until the case is settled "


POOR HEADLINE - hardly a win. Always develop your critical reading skills. I am tired of stupid reporters.
3 posted on 08/05/2003 7:07:08 AM PDT by PeterPrinciple
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bedolido

4 posted on 08/05/2003 7:13:06 AM PDT by Born Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jeffsher
I think all she accomplished on the long run is caused a big price increase for these pix on the black-market.

Supply goes to near zero...demand goes up.

5 posted on 08/05/2003 7:15:59 AM PDT by capt. norm
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: capt. norm
Topless pictures of Cameron Diaz and virtually every other female celebrity are readily available for free on the Net, or so I'm told...
6 posted on 08/05/2003 7:21:53 AM PDT by RoughDobermann (Get your stinking paws off me, you damned dirty ape!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: bedolido
Diaz has a right to protect the privacy of her own body.

And I'm sure the judge read this in the constitution.

7 posted on 08/05/2003 7:23:41 AM PDT by 1Old Pro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bedolido
"photographer John Rutter"

Sounds like the screen name of a porn star.

8 posted on 08/05/2003 7:25:11 AM PDT by robertpaulsen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RoughDobermann
Topless pictures of Cameron Diaz and virtually every other female celebrity are readily available for free on the Net

Google "robb's celebrity"- or so I'm told...

9 posted on 08/05/2003 7:26:28 AM PDT by fourdeuce82d
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: bedolido
Diaz has a right to protect the privacy of her own body.

She could have done that with a little common sense. DON'T POSE FOR NUDE PICTURES STUPID! There, I feel better now.

10 posted on 08/05/2003 7:28:52 AM PDT by Lost Highway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bedolido
"star of Charlie's Angles"

...yeah, that Charlie's Angles movie was great!...don't these idiots EVER proof-read their work before printing?...
11 posted on 08/05/2003 7:35:10 AM PDT by cweese
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bedolido
Typical, pose for nude or topless pictures while they are unknown and then when they become "stars" they whine about the pictures being sold
12 posted on 08/05/2003 7:56:08 AM PDT by sticker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bedolido
Very angry about this . . .
13 posted on 08/05/2003 8:23:55 AM PDT by Texas Federalist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson