1 posted on
08/04/2003 12:31:05 PM PDT by
Pikamax
To: Pikamax
Does this even surprise people?
2 posted on
08/04/2003 12:41:43 PM PDT by
Arpege92
To: Pikamax
Oh yeah? Well how many times did THEy interview Greg Packer, 38, Huntington LI???? HUh? Huh???
3 posted on
08/04/2003 12:45:01 PM PDT by
Chad Fairbanks
(So, I'm in the park wondering why frisbees get larger as they get closer when suddenly, it hits me..)
To: Liz; Timesink; Grampa Dave
Schadenfreude ping away!
4 posted on
08/04/2003 12:46:41 PM PDT by
martin_fierro
(A v v n c v l v s M a x i m v s)
To: martin_fierro; reformed_democrat; Loyalist; =Intervention=; PianoMan; GOPJ; Miss Marple; Tamsey; ...
This is the New York Times Schadenfreude Ping List. Freepmail me to be added or dropped.
This is the nascent Mainstream Media Shenanigans ping list. Please freepmail me to be added or dropped.
Please note this will likely become a high-volume list.
Also feel free to ping me if you come across a thread you would think worthy of the ping list. I can't catch them all!
6 posted on
08/04/2003 1:17:19 PM PDT by
Timesink
To: Pikamax
The link doesn't work.
9 posted on
08/04/2003 1:22:57 PM PDT by
=Intervention=
(White devils for Sharpton Central Florida chapter)
To: Pikamax
When folks are obligated to have intimate relations with other folks on the payroll and being required to check everything with Moscow, Annan, and Castro, that doesn't leave a lot of time. They have to be efficient everywhere they can. I'm sure that should any of these folks at the NYT win one of the endless prizes that they award themselves, this guy might get some credit, somewhere.
12 posted on
08/04/2003 1:32:56 PM PDT by
Tacis
To: Pikamax
Putz Shulzberger runs a tight ship, doesn't he? /sarcasm
To: Pikamax
My new favorite song:
"Dirty Deeds and the New York Times."
17 posted on
08/04/2003 7:41:33 PM PDT by
gcruse
(http://gcruse.blogspot.com/)
To: Pikamax
The New York Times is notorious for this. They steal everything and give it their own twist. The reporters poke through the pile of bound proofs from book publishers in order to do the subject first, before the book comes out. They are vultures.
They use their ridiculously out-of-proportion influence to squash what they find to be distasteful viewpoints that seem to be emerging.
Their sympathy for the perpetrator never fails to astound me. I think they sit around and discuss how to offend the sensibilities of the average commonsense reader. "Let's see: where would the reader's sympathies naturally lie? Right! Let's do a sympathetic story on the other side. Who's the victim in this situation? Good! Let's do a story on the victimizers and their problems."
To: Pikamax
It would appear that someone is eyeballing the Villager for stories. This shouldn't be a big case to break for the NYT.
19 posted on
08/04/2003 8:21:47 PM PDT by
thegreatbeast
(Quid lucrum istic mihi est?)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
