Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Jordanian parliament rejects women's rights bills as anti-Islamic
Jerusalem Post ^ | Aug. 4, 2003 | ASSOCIATED PRESS

Posted on 08/04/2003 12:30:16 PM PDT by Nachum

Jordan's new parliament has rejected two proposals giving women more rights because, some deputies say, they contradict Islamic teachings.

While parliament was dormant in 2001, the government amended the two bills to allow women to file for divorce and to give courts the leeway to impose harsh punishment on what has become known as honor killings—men who kill women relatives who are perceived to have shamed family honor.

Sunday, in just its third session since the June 17 parliamentary elections, the 110-seat Chamber of Deputies rejected the amendments to the Civil Status Law and the Penal Code by acclamation. The bills still have a chance to become law, but only after what could be protracted negotiations with the royal-appointed Senate.

Most of the 60 some speakers who took the floor Sunday spoke against both provisional bills.

Deputy Mahmoud Kharabsheh told The Associated Press that both temporary bills were "contradictory to our traditions and Islamic teachings.

"We rejected both legislation to protect the souls of our people, their homes and their lives. If it was up to me, women should remain at home to raise their children."

Even Hayat al-Museimi, one of six women who won seats in parliament designated under a state-imposed quota, said the state proposed amendments "encouraged family disintegration."

Human rights activist Sae'da Kilani said the rejection "sends us back to square one in our battle for wider freedoms for women in Jordan."

Government officials said the Senate, a 55-seat Chamber appointed by the king and whose legislative duties include liaising between the government and Chamber of Deputies, will debate both amendments and make its ruling later this month.

If the Senate endorses the amendments, both laws will be sent back to the Chamber of Deputies for another vote. If again rejected, the Chamber of Deputies and the Senate will meet in a joint session in which both bills could pass with a two-thirds majority vote, said Ghaleb al-Zou'bi, a deputy who heads parliament's Legal Committee.

The amendment to the penal code was rejected twice in the previous parliament—in 1999 and 2000—on grounds that a lenient punishment for male killers of female relatives deterred women from sin. Women died in "honor crimes" for having sex outside marriage or even after being raped.

The state was pressured to change the laws by local women rights organizations and international groups, including the European Parliament.

In June 2001, King Abdullah dissolved the previous parliament and enacted a temporary bill, which imposed capital punishment, as opposed to a prison term of up to six months in jail, for honor killings.

The Civil Status Law raised the age of marriage for both women and men to 18 from 15 and 16 respectively and allowed women to file for divorce.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Front Page News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: antiislamic; bills; divorce; honorkillings; honourcrimes; islam; jordan; jordanian; muslimwomen; rejects; rights; womansrights; womens

1 posted on 08/04/2003 12:30:17 PM PDT by Nachum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Nachum
Gee, what would Queen Noor say about this, what with her swipes at Israel and her whitewashing of the incredibly repressive nature of Arab countries.
2 posted on 08/04/2003 12:35:03 PM PDT by veronica (http://www.petitiononline.com/KN50711/petition.html - Confirm Daniel Pipes to USIP ......sign this!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum
Jordan, the true Palestine, the country that is already 80% palestinian. The country could easily welcome the palis occupying Israeli land considering that the Queen is a West Bank born pali. Yeah, this is the country that prides itself on making progress in the 21st century.
3 posted on 08/04/2003 1:13:10 PM PDT by lilylangtree
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum
"If it was up to me, women should remain at home to raise their children."

And wacko feminists (a.k.a. Hirsute Dykes) still whine and bitch about Western society's "glass ceiling."

BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAH!!!!!

4 posted on 08/04/2003 2:23:22 PM PDT by rickmichaels
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum
And Jordan is condsidered more progressive than its neighbors. Imagine that.
5 posted on 08/04/2003 3:42:53 PM PDT by PsyOp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lilylangtree
What does it mean to say that Jordan is already 80% Palestinian?

Who are the remaining 20%?

What area is covered by "Palestine"?
6 posted on 08/04/2003 5:53:04 PM PDT by tictoc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Nachum
Whoo boy -- this will have NOW and other equal rights groups marching in droves in solidarity with these oppressed Jordanian women! They will protest and force the news media to take notice of our foreign sisters' plight!

Or, maybe not so much. Hypocrites.
7 posted on 08/04/2003 7:03:46 PM PDT by ellery
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum
I doubt liberals will express outrage at this development. According to the Left, the treatment of women in Islamic nations is not oppression, but a celebration of cultural diversity. The dogma of Political Correctness overrules common sense with liberals.
8 posted on 08/04/2003 9:15:34 PM PDT by Kuksool
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson