Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: reegs
I'm a bit confused by this comment. Maybe I'm a bit behind in the news. Care to clarify?

Judicial nominees. The latest Dim filibuster of a judicial nominee involves a Catholic who is pro-Life. The Senate GOP is claiming--ludicrously in my opinion--that this is a case of anti Catholic bias. Of course it isn't. It is pro abortion bias. When the GOP claimed the Dims were anti-Hispanic regarding the Estrada filibuster, I found it equally ludicrous. And by the way, it was totally ineffective. The Dims have the #s, and are blocking pro life judges who are federalists ideologically. It's that simple.

15 posted on 08/04/2003 8:20:54 AM PDT by Huck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]


To: Huck
"It is pro abortion bias."

Which means that no one who holds to the beliefs taught by their church can be appointed as judge, because they are assuming that individual could not/would not follow the law. Thus, Catholics need not apply.

51 posted on 08/04/2003 9:03:20 AM PDT by MEGoody
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson