Skip to comments.
Dead scientist revealed Iraq dirty bomb
Sunday Times ^
| 08/03/03
| Nicholas Rufford
Posted on 08/03/2003 6:30:52 AM PDT by Pikamax
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-48 next last
1
posted on
08/03/2003 6:30:52 AM PDT
by
Pikamax
To: Pikamax
Maples pressed Kelly on why details had not been included in the dossier, saying: "A dirty nuclear bomb, I would have thought, was pretty significant." Kelly said: "You cannot include everything." WTF???
2
posted on
08/03/2003 6:37:43 AM PDT
by
tsmith130
To: Pikamax
They (the government) were obviously looking for ways of making the dossier as attractive as they could, and as threatening as they could.Huh? Oh well, there's lots of this Kelly stuff that's confusing and contradictory.
3
posted on
08/03/2003 6:43:16 AM PDT
by
mtbopfuyn
To: tsmith130
"A dirty nuclear bomb, I would have thought, was pretty significant." Kelly said: "You cannot include everything." I take that to mean there would be way too much wading thru.
With evidence do you have to show it ALL to make your case?
To: mtbopfuyn
They (the government) were obviously looking for ways of making the dossier as attractive as they could, and as threatening as they could.You know the implication in the above statement suggest all the gov't was doing was lying about everything so they had to doctor up the dossier.
Who here believes the gov't was lying about Iraq and it's WMD?
To: Pikamax
Hmmm, You can bet the Congressional 'RATS,ABCNNBCBS/NYT/LAT/WP shall not say a thing about this. It would shredd, what little credibility they have left.
6
posted on
08/03/2003 7:04:19 AM PDT
by
skinkinthegrass
(Just because you're paranoid,doesn't mean they aren't out to get you. :)
To: sirchtruth
I can name a lot who believe there are no WMD's They are found in Washington and are called democracts.
7
posted on
08/03/2003 7:15:45 AM PDT
by
gulfcoast6
(Sure is hot down here, need some wintertime to come.)
To: gulfcoast6
Dirty bombs scare the hell out of me. Easier to make and use, and sufficiently devastating. I put 'em at the top of the list of 'most likely' WMD's.
8
posted on
08/03/2003 8:02:16 AM PDT
by
chiller
(could be wrong, but doubt it)
To: gulfcoast6
Dirty bombs scare the hell out of me. Easier to make and use, and sufficiently devastating. I put 'em at the top of the list of 'most likely' WMD's.
9
posted on
08/03/2003 8:02:16 AM PDT
by
chiller
(could be wrong, but doubt it)
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach; Dog Gone; hchutch; Grampa Dave; Travis McGee; Lazamataz; Miss Marple; ...
Seems this article was posted this morning and people missed it.
10
posted on
08/03/2003 1:16:47 PM PDT
by
Dog
(Drove my Jagwire to the Quagmire but the Quagmire was DRY!!!)
To: mware; Carolina; TexKat; Ragtime Cowgirl
During evidence to the foreign affairs select committee in July, in remarks which have been largely overlooked, Kelly told John Maples, a former Conservative spokesman on defence and foreign affairs: "On one inspection that I led ... the acknowledgment was made by General Fahi Shaheen, together with Brigadier Hassan (two senior Iraqi weapons specialists), that they had undertaken experiments with radiological weapons in 1987." Maples asked: "Do you think that is true?" to which Kelly replied: "Undoubtedly it is true."
Maples pressed Kelly on why details had not been included in the dossier, saying: "A dirty nuclear bomb, I would have thought, was pretty significant." Kelly said: "You cannot include everything."
11
posted on
08/03/2003 1:19:39 PM PDT
by
Dog
(Drove my Jagwire to the Quagmire but the Quagmire was DRY!!!)
To: chiller
Dirty bombs scare the hell out of me. Easier to make and use, and sufficiently devastating.Let alone the difficulties involed with tracking down the source of it.
12
posted on
08/03/2003 1:22:02 PM PDT
by
EGPWS
To: Dog
Thanks, I was one of those who missed it.
13
posted on
08/03/2003 1:23:14 PM PDT
by
Dog Gone
To: Pikamax
Very interesting. Where is Kelly's amassed evidence now? I hope GWB and Condoleeza have full access to it. Is Blair sharing?
14
posted on
08/03/2003 1:27:15 PM PDT
by
Palladin
(Proud to be a FReeper!)
To: Dog Gone
I found this at instanpundit....and checked to see it had been posted and sure enough it was..
15
posted on
08/03/2003 1:37:30 PM PDT
by
Dog
(Drove my Jagwire to the Quagmire but the Quagmire was DRY!!!)
To: Dog Gone
I wonder what else Dr. Kelly mentioned in his appearance that the media missed.
16
posted on
08/03/2003 1:39:06 PM PDT
by
Dog
(Drove my Jagwire to the Quagmire but the Quagmire was DRY!!!)
To: Dog
The other story that was posted there I just linked to ATRW before you pinged me.
17
posted on
08/03/2003 1:39:08 PM PDT
by
Mr. Mulliner
(I could be a really good Christian if other people didn't mess me up all the time.)
To: Mr. Mulliner
I saw it Kurt......how reliable is that reporter who found the "smoking gun".
18
posted on
08/03/2003 1:40:21 PM PDT
by
Dog
(Drove my Jagwire to the Quagmire but the Quagmire was DRY!!!)
To: tsmith130
Scientists, Inspectors, Intelligence agents (see the Italians and "forged" documents), State Dept. losers attempting to control matters of war and peace. How utterly frightening!
Why have elections when we can be ruled, I mean over-ruled by these backstabbing bureaucrats?
The CIA
is unable to corroborate the uranium story.
is unable to locate Bin Laden, Hussein, or WMDs.
is unable to predict or stop 9/11.
is unable to predict the complete economic collapse of the Soviet Union.
We won't even go to the Arab slurping Foggy Bottom.
See a trend here?
It's time to purge all of these "institutions."
Bring back the Illuminati.
Just kidding
about the Illuminati part.
19
posted on
08/03/2003 1:43:35 PM PDT
by
TD911
To: skinkinthegrass
Becareful what you wish for. Rumsfeld bungled and did not secure nuclear waste and storage locations and they were looted pretty much as American troops sat back and watched.
20
posted on
08/03/2003 1:53:35 PM PDT
by
Destro
(Know your enemy! Help fight Islamic terrorisim by visiting www.johnathangaltfilms.com)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-48 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson