Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: CWOJackson
If this kind of case goes to court it would get some serious media coverage. That coverage will include some very graphic and specific testimony.

I would hope so. Though I have some apprehension, I know it is best for people to see such procedures unfiltered or edited. Such procedures viewed in their naked rawness is precisely what this country needs to see so that they can see what the business of abortion is all about: death, or as the horse's mouth would say, early fetal demise, of a baby.

935 posted on 08/10/2003 12:42:43 AM PDT by Chief_Joe (From where the sun now sits, I will fight on -FOREVER!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 934 | View Replies ]


To: Chief_Joe
The press is predictable in one regard: they're ratings driven and are like sharks.

I'm positive that some networks would want to ignore the trial because of their positions on abortion. But other networks, such as Fox, wouldn't. Once one network starts reporting it the rest will join in the feeding frenzy.

The majority of American's are sort of neutral on abortion because of all the propaganda. Let a high profile trial get on the air, and reporters digging for the ratings, and those people are going to learn some very unsavory things. That would swing the opinions of a lot of neutral people.

936 posted on 08/10/2003 12:46:53 AM PDT by CWOJackson (The World According to Garp isn't that bad when compared with The World According to Todd.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 935 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson