[Chief_Joe]

No one was attempting by this bill to overturn Roe v. Wade.

As I understand it... Congress can only act to reduce the horrors of specific practices of abortion incrementally.

Ok, I'm pragmatic enough to know that something achieved is better than nothing. There's another side to me that says there may be another reason for some of confusing language in the bill. With such language, I believe those performing these types of procedures will be taking to court and have to defend themselves. Regardless of the outcome it will likely cost them a lot of money in legal fees. This most certainly will reduce the number of persons willing to perform such procedures, and it is a good example of product introduction and development for those in the legal business. LOL.

[CWOJackson]

If this kind of case goes to court it would get some serious media coverage. That coverage will include some very graphic and specific testimony.

I seriously doubt the abortion industry wants the average American to hear details like that. It would only cost them in the long run.